Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+ARRL\s+suggested\s+format\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+ARRL\s+suggested\s+format\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] ARRL suggested format? (score: 1): Author: jleahy@norwich.net (Jim Leahy); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 06:06:55 -0500; Sweepstakes: The rules state that paper logs must clearly show on/off times. However, to submit electronically, in the "suggested ARRL format", the conversion removes all indications of on/off times.; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00031.html (7,064 bytes)
2. [TRLog] ARRL suggested format? (score: 1): Author: gbaron@sparc.isl.net (Gilbert Baron); Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 11:44:24 GMT; I missed that. I submitted the disk and no ON OFF times. I did not in any way accumulate the maximum time even if they use the first time in my log to the last so it may not matter. If they assume n; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00034.html (8,268 bytes)
3. [TRLog] ARRL suggested format? (score: 1): Author: n4af@qsl.net (Howard Hoyt); Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 07:40:33 -0500; I dont think that is what he was saying: TRLOG supports on/times via \on \off entries in the callsign window. The PROBLEM is that when you use POST to convert to ARRL format, -ALL- log comments are r; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00036.html (8,298 bytes)
4. [TRLog] ARRL suggested format? (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 06:47:09 -0800 (PST); I just list them on the summary sheet - it has worked so far. Tree N6TR tree@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative re; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00040.html (7,160 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]