Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+CODE\s+SPEED\s+CHANGES\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+CODE\s+SPEED\s+CHANGES\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: w4tyu@icx.net (Jean Giesler); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 17:16:11 +0000; Mark requested the ability to change computer code speed by one word per minute. I am sorry but I do not see that a change on one WPM would be useful. If it cannot be copied at 35, it cannot be copie; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00010.html (7,745 bytes)
2. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:09:45 -0500; I share this view. I start SS at 32 wpm, step down to 29 as others (and I) get tired, and find 3 WPM steps enough so that one, or two at most, will get me where I need to be when someone calls who ca; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00011.html (9,132 bytes)
3. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:20:38 -0600; Both went on to talk about their operating techniques. This was not my intent. I am sure we all have our things we like and things we don't like. What may be important to me may not be important to y; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00012.html (8,596 bytes)
4. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:41:42 -0500; A change of one WPM is like a tenth of a db. I like to set my speed to 28 to start and tend to return to that from faster or slower speeds. But getting set on 28 wpm to start is just one ALT-S at the; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00013.html (10,297 bytes)
5. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:59:51 -0600; This isn't a big deal to me, but it seems that if Tree added a CW SPEED INCREMENT option and set the default to 3, nobody would have to change any of their behaviour unless they felt they wanted to.; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00014.html (12,886 bytes)
6. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:22:19 -0600; This is one of those days when I wonder if we are speaking the same language. My questions are: Tree: Is it easy or hard to make this change? Everyone else: Is this of any value to you? The question; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00015.html (10,342 bytes)
7. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: dl2zav@darc.de (Udo DL2ZAV); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:29:30 +0100; Well, I'd prefer 2 wpm steps. Slowing down from 25 to 22 or even from 22 to 19 is a bit coarse. At higher speeds, the 3 wpm steps are OK. I got around it by setting Farnsworth speed to (in my case) 2; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00017.html (9,861 bytes)
8. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:15:09 -0500; If it's easy, sure. If it would displace other needed improvements in the queue, then I'd give it a low priority. I think that's what we were saying, and illustrating why we felt that way. 73, Pete N; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00018.html (8,950 bytes)
9. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:39:16 -0500; I thought I replied to the list, but maybe it didn't take...seems like I have that problem on this reflector from time to time... You're right...it's another case of people not "getting it". If Tree; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00019.html (9,371 bytes)
10. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:36:37 -0500; about technique. That's all. This thread is becoming very complicated. Well, pretty plain now... Given that Tree has probably been compensated about $0.05 per hour he has put in on TR, don't you thi; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00020.html (9,316 bytes)
11. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:53:36 -0500; What was the reason for changing from 16 to 17 and back? This isn't a big deal to me, but it seems that if Tree added a CW SPEED INCREMENT option and set the default to 3, nobody would have to change; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00021.html (13,696 bytes)
12. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:23:33 -0800; Ah sucks guys... this has been fun to watch. It is hard to change code with your hands down. Hmmm - well, you guys should understand that Mark was my best man at my first wedding and he sang my my s; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00022.html (9,604 bytes)
13. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:42:07 -0600; I am the first to agree with this - if it is not an easy change! Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00023.html (8,850 bytes)
14. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: n0ss@earthlink.net (Tom Hammond NØSS); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:39:02 -0600; I would certainly appreciate having the speed increment be made user-settable. This does NOT, however, necessarily imply that I want to be able to change it in 1 WPM increments, but that I would lik; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00024.html (9,144 bytes)
15. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:49:19 -0600; Gosh. I was trying to figure out the best way to say this without coming off really looney. I guess you said it, Tree. Like I said, if it's easy then great. If it is not, I agree with Pete and every; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00025.html (8,870 bytes)
16. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:51:55 -0800; It would be easy to make this change. In addition to 1 - 10 WPM, I will have a value called RANDOM that will select a random speed change amount. This will make life more interesting. Tree -- FAQ on; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00026.html (8,699 bytes)
17. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: hrg@cifnet.com (Mike D.); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:57:30 -0600; How about randomly switching between International and American Morse. If it isn't too much trouble. ;-) 73 de Mike, N9BOR FISTS MAC SMC ZUT http://www.qsl.net/n9bor MAC http://www.qsl.net/mac di da; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00027.html (8,499 bytes)
18. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: w4zw@home.com (W4ZW); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:07:39 -0500; Let's randomly add in Cyrillic why we're at it. I'm getting rusty. Jon, W4ZW Breckenridge, CO QTH (for another week) How about randomly switching between International and American Morse. If it isn't; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00028.html (9,197 bytes)
19. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: mwdink@eskimo.com (mwdink@eskimo.com); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:31:30 -0800; Alright! now I can blame my erratic speed changes on the program dink In addition to 1 - 10 WPM, I will have a value called RANDOM that will select a random speed change amount. This will make life m; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00029.html (8,083 bytes)
20. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1): Author: k4ro@k4ro.net (K4RO Kirk Pickering); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:14:11 -0600; Yes, I would really like to see this feature, if it's easy to implement. -Kirk K4RO -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00030.html (8,789 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]