Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+CW\s+Serial\s+Interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+CW\s+Serial\s+Interface\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] CW Serial Interface (score: 1): Author: jsroux@msn.com (Sheryl Roux); Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 06:29:33 -0400; If I choose COM1 to send CW to the radio, what should happen between pins= 4 and 5 of the DB9 COM1 connector when a CW message is sent? In my case= nothing happens. The voltage between pins 4 & 5 is; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00090.html (6,860 bytes)
2. [TRLog] CW Serial Interface (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:40:09 -0400; What OS are you using? If you are using Windows NT, 2000, or XP, it is possible to lose control of the physical device to the OS and not be able to use it. This is not uniformly true and some are abl; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00093.html (8,363 bytes)
3. [TRLog] CW Serial Interface (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:17:08 -0400; At least on a 200 MHz Pentium this is not a problem. I have such a machine with a serial mouse on COM 2 and radios on COM 1 and 4, keying and controlling the SO2R box via LPT1. Works fine, even in a; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00094.html (7,359 bytes)
4. [TRLog] CW Serial Interface (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:31:13 -0400; Well, I had a 200 MHz (or was it a 166) Pentium that it WOULDN'T work on. I got it to work once after a HD crash when the mouse was disconnected, but that was before I reloaded all my stuff and made; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00096.html (9,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]