Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Dupes\s+\&\s+Exchanges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Dupes\s+\&\s+Exchanges\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Dupes & Exchanges (score: 1): Author: 4x4nj@iname.com (R. Kline); Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:09:54 -0000; I have 2 problems: 1- In the CQ WW the duplicate contacts were not marked "dupe" etc. They were given zero points, but since the rules required dupes to be clearly marked, I had to manually insert "d; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00135.html (7,855 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Dupes & Exchanges (score: 1): Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto); Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:19:24 +0100; Hi Riki and all, I try to answer. It is an apparent problem, but not real indeed. For two reason: a- when the contest is over, run POST and this program will do the work for you (checking for dupes,; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00141.html (8,562 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Dupes & Exchanges (score: 1): Author: juhan@chem.ut.ee (Juhan Põldvere; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:17:50 +0200 (EET); Hi Riki, The solution to the received exchange problem is in a place that is nearly impossible to guess. Suggested by Igor, UA9CDC: ( http://lists.contesting.com/_trlog/200002/msg00015.html ) Logging; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00142.html (7,119 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Dupes & Exchanges (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:21:36 -0800; I feel that Bob is right but we all know that in the past this contest has had log checkers that have been somewhat rigid in their application of the rules. So it might be worth checking with the per; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00145.html (8,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]