Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Hmmmmm\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Hmmmmm\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 07:17:16 -0800 (PST); I just got this: Obviously, there will be more to report later. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@co; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00115.html (7,589 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: blckhole@ripco.com (Keith Morehouse); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 13:16:24 -0600; I don't know if it's at the heart of YOUR problem, but, those who use Netscape 4.0's emailer need to keep in mind that the default method of sending attachments is in MIME format. Evidently, ARRL has; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00116.html (8,124 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 16:21:15 -0500; I don't think so -- I just got an ack this morning from ARRL for a TR POST-produced SS log (the ARRL format), sent to them as a MIME attachment from Eudora 3.0. 73, Pete N4ZR In Wild Wonderful, fairl; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00118.html (8,221 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: n9ssg@pobox.com (David Yanke); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 15:45:05 -0500; Gather 'round and here what Pete Smith had to say at 16:21 on 18 Dec 97 I Pegasus there is a configuration that is "Allow 8 bit MIME Encoding". Is it possible that you somehow have MIME enabled and a; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00119.html (8,860 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: ni2p@panix.com (Leon Kanopka); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 18:15:20 -0500; My log was rejected by the ARRL because it was 64 bit MIME encoded. I do not know why it was, as I told Pegasus not to encode it. I sent it a second time and the same thing happened. The third time I; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00122.html (8,775 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: wday@cq.net (Wayne Day); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 23:24:49 +0000; Thus, it's not a problem. -- Wayne Day N5WD wday@cq.net Fort Worth,Texas,USA | CompuServe: 76703.376@CompuServe.Com n5wd@amsat.org | ,__o EMT/Paramedic @ MedStar Fort Worth My work Phone? 9-1-1 |--\_; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00123.html (8,957 bytes)
7. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 15:37:48 -0800 (PST); Yes - sending in ASCII is something that can be hard to do depending on which program you are using. It is one of those basic skills that gets harder to do as mail programs get more intelligent. Thi; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00124.html (9,178 bytes)
8. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:16:54 -0600; Maybe it would be better if they simply asked (required) us to FTP them. Wouldn't that take care of differences in systems and applications? FTP is FTP, isn't it? I have attached files and sent them; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00128.html (10,192 bytes)
9. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 04:34:03 -0600 (CST); My clunky Eudora-Lite puts stuff in MIME attachments as well. In the past, this hasn't bothered ARRL. So far this year, I haven't gotten ANY confirmations, with or without caveat.... 73, Jim N9JF --; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00129.html (9,478 bytes)
10. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: gbaron@sparc.isl.net (Gilbert Baron); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 11:26:45 GMT; I am extremely skeptical that mime has anything to do with the problem. I would be extremely surprised if the software on the other end does not support it and if it did not then you would probably; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00130.html (10,540 bytes)
11. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 07:40:59 -0600 (CST); <snip> I think all we can say is that it MAY not be a problem, depending on which contradictions the ARRL is ignoring and which rules they have decided to enforce - which are answers we don't know ye; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00132.html (8,219 bytes)
12. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: ae2t@bigfoot.com (Al Gritzmacher); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 10:21:45 -0500; No, you still have a choice of sending it as ASCII or Binary in FTP. Chances are whatever 'flavor' we sent would be the opposite of what they want! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.h; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00135.html (8,472 bytes)
13. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 10:37:05 -0600 (CST); After a couple of weeks, I'm spooked. Resent the SS and 160 logs to ARRL. Will keep y'all informed. MIME attachments, Eudora Lite, TR 6.15 Post ARRL formatted. 73, Jim N9JF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00137.html (7,680 bytes)
14. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: w7ct@juno.com (James B Lawrence); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 10:07:17 -0700; I have no faith in e-mailing logs to the ARRL or their ability to receive them correctly. I have also read the instructions they have on there web pages. Their in instructions are not specific enough; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00138.html (8,877 bytes)
15. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: gbaron@sparc.isl.net (Gilbert Baron); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 12:13:16 -0600; Not true, if you send text it will not be encoded, that would be a waste and except in the worst programs it is not done. Furthermore, if you want to be certain it is ascii and not encoded, then send; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00139.html (10,207 bytes)
16. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: ni2p@panix.com (Leon Kanopka); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 18:40:42 -0500; ASCII files FTPed as binary type will still be ASCII. Binary files FTPed as ASCII will be corrupted, so this should not be a concern with ASCII logs. Leon -- Leon home: ni2p@panix.com work: leonk@ins; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00144.html (8,234 bytes)
17. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: wtill@bordercity.com (William Till); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 22:11:01 -0700; All this leads one to the unfortunate conclusion that ARRL may not yet have assembled their dung. A situation that unfortunately happens a bit too often. The mass confusion may be an incentive for th; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00145.html (7,592 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]