Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Kantronics\s+Issue\?\?\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Kantronics Issue??? (score: 1)
Author: retire@rconnect.com (Larry Menzel)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:24:22 -0600
Hello listers: I spoke both with George and with Kantronics on the issue of one way communications from my KPC 3 to Trlog and back. First: Will someone who is using a KPC 3 with Trlog please email me
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00003.html (7,840 bytes)

2. [TRLog] Kantronics Issue??? (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 12:42:10 -0800
Duh - I don't know. I don't have a KPC 3. I haven't had anyone tell me it didn't work before. Ugh. TR should be sending the carriage return. Are you sure this isn't and EIGHT BIT PACKET PORT = TRUE
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00004.html (7,411 bytes)

3. [TRLog] Kantronics Issue??? (score: 1)
Author: k8bkdx@chartermi.net (Barry Martz)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 17:05:39 -0500
Using old KAM here and have never had any problems. I have the following: PACKET PORT = SERIAL 3 EIGHT BIT PACKET PORT = TRUE PACKET BAUD RATE = 4800 PACKET BEEP = FALSE PACKET SPORTS = ALL PACKET SP
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00006.html (8,872 bytes)

4. [TRLog] Kantronics Issue??? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O Hachadorian)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 17:14:49 +0000
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:24:22 -0600 "Larry Menzel" <retire@rconnect.com> writes: The KPC-3 works fine with TR. TR's default baud rate is 2400, so you have to set the KPC-3 to that rate from another pro
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00007.html (8,008 bytes)

5. [TRLog] Kantronics Issue??? (score: 1)
Author: lenrev@ameritech.net (Len Revelle)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:07:33 -0600
Make sure another packet program didn't leave the KPC3 in KISS mode.
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00008.html (7,540 bytes)

6. [TRLog] Kantronics Issue??? (score: 1)
Author: retire@rconnect.com (Larry Menzel)
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 08:22:34 -0600
SOLVED.... Yes...Tree reminded me that this was probably that EIGHT BIT PACKET PORT thing.. Changed it and it's working...thanks all who helped. Larry, N0XB
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00009.html (9,842 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu