Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Log\s+Submission\s+and\s+Times\s+Off\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: Jack Trampler" <n2jt@fast.net (Jack Trampler)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:52:34 -0500
I just generated my Cabrillo formatted log for submission to the ARRL for this past weekend's Sweepstakes. I noticed the log does not include TImes Off. In the past I just included them on the Summar
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00055.html (7,748 bytes)

2. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi)
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 12:00:26 -0500
-- Forwarded Message The 2000-2001 ARRL contest season kicks off this weekend with the 2000 ARRL November CW Sweepstakes. The 1999-2000 season was the best ever for the ARRL, as we processed a record
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00056.html (12,005 bytes)

3. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: andy@petersonkids.com (Andy Peterson)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:29 -0500 (EST)
Interesting.. I thought you were supposed to put the on/off in the "soapbox" section of the Cabrillo file.. maybe that was for another recent test. ARRL rules on the web as of today state: 2.4.2. In
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00068.html (8,370 bytes)

4. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: N7DR@arrl.net (D. R. Evans)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:42:25 -0600
Which leads one to wonder how it knows when I was merely listening. Or doesn't listening time count as "on" time any more? Doc N7DR PS But this really ought to be on some sort of Cabrillo reflector,
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00077.html (9,714 bytes)

5. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: LRod@pobox.com (LRod@pobox.com)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 01:46:22 -0000
The very thought that crossed my mind when I read the original comment. 73, Rod K4QG | It's pronounced Never be afraid to try something new; remember amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00078.html (8,011 bytes)

6. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: w7ti@jps.net (Bill Turner)
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 19:01:43 -0800
-- 73, Bill W7TI -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com Featur
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00082.html (7,822 bytes)

7. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: andy@petersonkids.com (Andy Peterson)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 13:46:24 -0500 (EST)
I was wondering the exact same thing.. perhaps it's such an insignificant amount of slop that The Powers That Be thought it could slide.. It'd be interesting to see the average "listened but didn't m
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00096.html (9,917 bytes)

8. [TRLog] Log Submission and Times Off (score: 1)
Author: Daniel.Violette@West.Boeing.com (Violette, Daniel R)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 13:02:48 -0800
I would recommend no one get too worked up about off times. This reflector will get filled up too like all the others do with 'discussions'. This is really not a change in policy. You listen when you
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00097.html (9,149 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu