Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+NWT\s+or\s+YT\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+NWT\s+or\s+YT\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] NWT or YT? (score: 1): Author: w2cs@ipass.net (Gary J. Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:38:45 -0500; I know this has been discussed before, but I can't find the reference. TRLog overrides the YT that J sends with Nwt. Which is acceptable to the League's log checking program, or are both equivalent a; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00111.html (6,957 bytes)
2. [TRLog] NWT or YT? (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: 8 Nov 2000 21:10:15 -0000; I'll answer your question in a different way - one that perhaps can be applied to other similar questions: The same guy who wrote TR Log wrote the SS Log checking software. 73 Tree -- FAQ on WWW: ht; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00115.html (7,176 bytes)
3. [TRLog] NWT or YT? (score: 1): Author: n0ss@earthlink.net (Tom Hammond NØSS); Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:51:06 -0600; Gary: LITERAL DOMESTIC QTH = TRUE I guess my only question here is whether it makes a darn bit of difference IF TRLog does change YT to NWT. In this contest they both count for the same section and o; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00118.html (7,429 bytes)
4. [TRLog] NWT or YT? (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: 8 Nov 2000 22:28:26 -0000; I think TR conforms to what the ARRL told me to use for the sections. If you look at the .PDF file the ARRL has for their summary sheet, it has NT. I think NT is a terrible abbreviation because it c; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00119.html (8,080 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]