Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+POST\s+ate\s+Chip\s+\&\s+J\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+POST\s+ate\s+Chip\s+\&\s+J\!\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 02:21:25 +0000; I've been annoyed how VY1JA keeps vanishing from my TRMASTER file. I keep editing J back in, but for some reason he doesn't hang around for long. Lately, I've felt as if data displayed from my TRMAST; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00074.html (8,216 bytes)
2. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 02:26:17 +0000; Judging from the silence, I take it nobody else has noticed calls disappearing from their TRMASTER file. I was hoping somebody would be able to confirm if they've seen a DL call or something like tha; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00077.html (7,733 bytes)
3. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: Mirko Sibilja" <s57ad@amis.net (Mirko Sibilja); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:57:31 +0100; Um, I noticed the same thing as Brett did. I think it *is* related with the size of cells. I have quite large database (TRMASTER.ASC size is 1.7 MB), with 'S5' cell being the largest, and there are d; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00079.html (8,803 bytes)
4. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:32:41 -0800; I think Mirko is on the right track here. The obvious thing in common with Chip (K7JA) and Jay (VY1JA) is the JA in their callsign... which is often the largest cell in the database. The other thing; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00080.html (9,634 bytes)
5. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:07:57 -0500; IMO there is a tremendous amount of "clap" in the master call files that date back before K8CC's effort this year. I use one from two years ago, and am always astounded by the number of apparently bu; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00081.html (7,983 bytes)
6. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: retire@rconnect.com (Larry Menzel); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:44:01 -0600; Pete...let me know as soon as you have that paring-down completed. I'll be happy to take a look at your work for you..<G> Larry, N0XB IMO there is a tremendous amount of "clap" in the master call fil; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00082.html (8,626 bytes)
7. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: juhan@chem.ut.ee (Juhan Põldvere); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:43:57 +0200; Are you using a ready-made subroutine library to handle the database? Are calls that don't make it into the first 64K really dumped? Why can't you use extention cells for over-large doublets, with a; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00085.html (8,167 bytes)
8. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:10:57 -0800; No. If they meet the criteria explained in my previous post - yes. I could do this - and add more complexity to the code. However, I think there are more important places for me to spend my limited; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00086.html (8,245 bytes)
9. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 01:11:36 +0000; S57AD added: Well, at least it isn't just me - cheers, Mirko! The JA cell, from my recollection, came out because I'd hit that 64k brick wall. My largest one now is JH, at ~43k. It'll be a while befo; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00087.html (9,091 bytes)
10. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 02:38:04 +0000; I'd previously suggested: The beauty of TRMASTER is that it gives one the ability to see what one has copied in the past for a particular call. Having that data show on screen as I operate has defini; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00094.html (8,695 bytes)
11. [TRLog] POST ate Chip & J! (score: 1): Author: dl2zav@gmx.de (Udo DL2ZAV); Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 23:59:11 +0100; Hi, <VR2BrettGraham, 20 Mar 2002>: Didn't have time for a response until now. The DL cell is still there (and maybe the JA cell is back??). Cell DL is my largest as reported by POST, but until now it; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00095.html (9,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]