- 1. [TRLog] QTCs (score: 1)
- Author: mtessmer@mindspring.com (Mike Tessmer)
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:36:18 -0400
- I was dabbling in WAE this past weekend. When DF0WA asked for QTCs (on 20M), I willingly obliged. However, having only about 20 QSOs in the log over 2 bands, when I pulled up the QTC window, DF0WA (f
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-09/msg00051.html (7,446 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] QTCs (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: 13 Sep 1999 15:47:03 -0000
- There is no way to do this currently - and I am sorry to say that the problem is very difficult to solve. I doubt I will be able to do anything about this in future releases. It is just a limitation
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-09/msg00052.html (7,791 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] QTCs (score: 1)
- Author: ua9cdc@dialup.mplik.ru (Igor Sokolov)
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:07:14 +0600
- I appreciate the fact that WAE is probably one of the most difficult contests for a logging software to deal with. Anyway here is another request. I do not remember this being a problem in the past b
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-09/msg00054.html (8,383 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] QTCs (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: 13 Sep 1999 19:06:33 -0000
- This was fixed in a recent release. The WAE implementation never considered multi operator. Possible. I will look into it. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: tr
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-09/msg00055.html (8,196 bytes)
- 5. [TRLog] QTCs (score: 1)
- Author: jerry@ua9ar.chel.com.ru (Jerry Sidorov)
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 11:26:30 +0500
- Why? As far as I remember TRLog v.6.25 (or earlier) worked properly! If QTC block of 10 contained the target call then TRLog cut QTC block to quantity before that one. The program had a solution that
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-09/msg00057.html (7,589 bytes)
- 6. [TRLog] QTCs (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: 14 Sep 1999 05:34:00 -0000
- Nothing - this is the solution that should be there now and it is fixed that way again in 6.44. I was saying that a more complicated solution where I skip that station and then come back to it later
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-09/msg00058.html (7,566 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu