Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+RE\:\s+Number\s+of\s+band\s+changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+RE\:\s+Number\s+of\s+band\s+changes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] RE: Number of band changes (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 07:20:45 -0600; Yes. Our new personal best was "829" on Saturday. It was a tough pace. I agree. Can anyone tell me why I would want to monitor it during the contest? Thanks. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00063.html (7,305 bytes)
2. [TRLog] RE: Number of band changes (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:32:05 -0500; Sure...the ARRL went from a 10-minute rule to a 6 band changes per hour rule a couple of years ago. I don't remember which contests this concerned, but it was for M/S and/or M/2. 73 de Lee -- Lee Hie; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00065.html (7,502 bytes)
3. [TRLog] RE: Number of band changes (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:12:13 -0600; Well that answers THAT. Thanks Lee. I can admit to being out of touch for some years, but this is downright embarrassing. Joke's on me. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00066.html (7,387 bytes)
4. [TRLog] RE: Number of band changes (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:37:37 -0600; However, NAQP rules state: 5.b.(iv): Each transmitter must have at least 10 minutes between band changes. 73, dale, kg5u -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contest; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00068.html (7,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]