Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Re\:\s+TR\s+Log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Re\:\s+TR\s+Log\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Re: TR Log (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:42:44 -0700; The what? You mean, they won't take Cabrillo (the same format as the contests)? Tree; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00084.html (6,562 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Re: TR Log (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (Gil Baron); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:19:29 -0500; They will take Cabrillo for the contest (I THINK) but it won't get you in the log book of the world so you automatically and quickly get qsl cards. You will have to do this or you will lose a lot of; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00085.html (7,797 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Re: TR Log (score: 1): Author: Sylvan Katz <jskatz@sk.sympatico.ca> (Sylvan Katz); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:34:43 -0600; ARRL I think you might be expecting too much too soon! It is a major development. As I recall from the latest discussion in the Trusted QSL group http://www.trustedqsl.org it is on target for the au; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00086.html (7,654 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Re: TR Log (score: 1): Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:46:04 -0400; Gil, Lose a lot of business??? I doubt it. Whatever comes out of Newington for this it will just be another format to convert to. If it does not get done inherent to TR it can be done externally via; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00087.html (8,882 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Re: TR Log (score: 1): Author: w2agn@w2agn.net (W2AGN); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:01:29 -0400; Don't worry, Ron. ARRL sez that LBoW will accept ADIF or Cabrillo formats, so TRlog already is set to go. Of course, the ARRL isn't, but what's new? -- _ _ _ _ _ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ John L. Sielke (; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00088.html (7,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]