Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+SPAM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+SPAM\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT); Okay - it looks like the consensus is to close the list. If someone does post from a different address than the one they are subscribed to, it will bounce to me for approval. This takes up my limited; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00061.html (7,507 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: wtill@bordercity.com (William G.Till - VE5FN); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 13:59:33 -0600; Hi fellow TRLog subscribers: Might I suggest that instead of righteously bitching about spam and pressuring Tree into spending more time monitoring the list, we simply delete the items we don't like; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00063.html (8,769 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: K5NZ@aol.com (K5NZ); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:31:54 EDT; This idea gets my vote also..... mike k5nz -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: own; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00064.html (7,735 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: Will KN6DV" <kn6dv@contesting.com (Will KN6DV); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:33:27 +0100; I second this one! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00065.html (8,338 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: jfeustle@uoft02.utoledo.edu (jfeustle); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:36:33 -0400; The delete key works just fine here. It's easy to find on any of my keyboards. I too would rather have Tree focus on the program instead of spending valuable time taking care of something that goes a; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00066.html (7,525 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul Hicks VE3ZT); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 19:37:07 -0400; Tree, I only notice 2 or 3 posts re this, don't know if you got lots directly, but hey, to me it's not a big deal to hit the trash icon. If you've got to put in extra time on my (our) behalf regardin; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00068.html (9,199 bytes)
7. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: glenn@newportnet.com (Glenn Adams); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:18:47 -0700; I'm in favor of the delete key as well. Glenn KD7C -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Probl; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00070.html (8,196 bytes)
8. [TRLog] SPAM (score: 1): Author: 107770.3462@compuserve.com (James P. Cassidy); Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:39:45 -0400; Tree, If its not too late I vote for the open situation and the use of delete. I am a little puzzled sinceI haven't seen any spam on any of the reflectors for quite some time. I wonader if some of it; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00073.html (7,740 bytes)
9. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: w7zrc@micron.net (Rod Greene); Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 06:25:01 -0600; Tree, I vote for continued use of the delete key. Don't take your time for this unless you feel it is absolutely necessary. I appreciate your work on the contest software. 73, Rod -- FAQ on WWW: http; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00074.html (7,469 bytes)
10. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: ae2t@bigfoot.com (Al Gritzmacher); Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 10:31:26 -0400; The usual solution is to subscribe multiple addresses, but have a way to turn off the messages going to some of them. That's usually built into the maillist program. The filters list in Eudora Pro th; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00077.html (9,092 bytes)
11. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:51:05 -0500; I replied originally directly to Tree. Since this discussion persists, and being an activist, I tend to agree with the statement by AE2T: Yep. There are ways to deal with it besides sticking your hea; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00082.html (8,702 bytes)
12. [TRLog] Spam (score: 1): Author: n9ssg@pobox.com (Dave Yanke); Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:52:17 -0600; Gather 'round to hear what swca@ionet.net said at about 19:51 on 27 Apr 98,: Someday, this may be true. But alas, as of now this is a misconception. Currently there are no laws that apply to SPAM. So; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-04/msg00086.html (9,096 bytes)
13. [Trlog] SPAM (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:42:03 -0700; Well - I put a stop to spam by making this a moderated list. There isn't so much traffic here that it will be much work. While that spam appeared to be coming from KC5AJX, it really wasn't. It was no; /archives//html/TRLog/2011-03/msg00024.html (6,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]