Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+State\s+QSO\s+Parties\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+State\s+QSO\s+Parties\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: n2cu@magtrol.com (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 08:33:10 -0500; I participated in the Minnesota QSO Party this past Saturday and had a great time as usual. My question has to do with logging mobile stations. This year the MnQP sponsors made a rule that mobiles mu; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-02/msg00037.html (7,344 bytes)
2. [TRLog] state QSO parties (score: 1): Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk); Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:23:20 -0600; time were it zoo -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com Featu; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-02/msg00052.html (7,888 bytes)
3. [TRLog] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: bobreis@juno.com (robert c reisenweber); Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 10:49:44 +0100; Jumped into the GA QSO Party yesterday and have a question regarding logging mobile QSO's. To eliminate duping, I started with K4AA/m, then K4AA/m1, K4AA/M2 and so on. Each one counts for a valid QSO; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-07/msg00093.html (6,994 bytes)
4. [TRLog] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 06:42:46 -0700; Bob, I log different mobile counties as CALL/CTY. For example: K4AA/BRO, K4AA/HIL, K4AA/BRE, and so on. Use the three letter county abbreviations that most state QSO parties have standardized on. 73,; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-07/msg00094.html (7,953 bytes)
5. [TRLog] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson); Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 11:10:09 -0400; I don't wish to slight the ops in Minnesota, however,I was interested how Minnesota QSO Party received a place in the standard contest list when Pennsylvania(one of the top two state QSO parties) nev; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-09/msg00081.html (7,214 bytes)
6. [TRLog] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 08:45:22 -0700 (PDT); Well - I disagree with "never is considered". I did consider it on at least two occasions. I thought I had made it clear that having non integer QSO point values was the issue. The impact of this wa; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-09/msg00082.html (7,417 bytes)
7. [TRLog] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson); Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 18:25:16 -0400; Tree, I agree with your plight, this has been a issue with most ops and it has been a topic of discussion at our PA QSO Party Symposiums. I would like to dump the 1 1/2 point CW but it makes it inte; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-09/msg00084.html (7,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]