Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+TR\-Log\-Win\s+survey\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+TR\-Log\-Win\s+survey\s+results\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: LogWindows@aol.com (LogWindows@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:19:15 EDT; Thanks to everyone who filled out the survey, here's the results and the direction we are going to take. This is the information is the results that was compiled after all the abusive, condescending; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00026.html (9,322 bytes)
2. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: Alan Kaul" <alan.kaul@worldnet.att.net (Alan Kaul); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 09:58:25 -0700; Sorry to see that it is not feasible. As more and more software becomes available to do other things, PSK-31 for example, it is a shame that you cannot use one window to operate the mode in an RTTY c; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00027.html (7,830 bytes)
3. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:32:22 -0400; and product. be Rick, I can't imagine how you came up with that number, but if you're satisfied it's correct you would have to be crazy to embark on such a project, particularly without the TRLog nam; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00028.html (8,604 bytes)
4. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: w4zw@home.com (Jon, W4ZW); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:30:45 -0400; [Pete N4ZR wrote] > An aside -- I have been running TRLog on CW in a DOS window under Win98 SE That's what I do here under WIN98 and win95, depending on which computer I have connected. Works fine he; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00029.html (8,496 bytes)
5. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:43:00 -0500; So, besides the TR Log reflector, where was the survey advertised? Are you assuming that the market for a TRLog for Windows would be the same set of hams that currently use TR Log for DOS and are int; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00030.html (8,673 bytes)
6. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: wa4et@hotmail.com (David Price); Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:03:18 -0000; All this makes me wonder what the REAL problem is..so many of us do it without a problem _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at ht; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00035.html (9,838 bytes)
7. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:11:21 -0400; Exactly. We've had the problem at N4AF in multi setups. Two computers would run TR just fine under windows, the others would not. NEVER able to pin down anything. Had one computer to run TR fine unde; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00037.html (8,160 bytes)
8. [TRLog] TR-Log-Win survey results (score: 1): Author: wa4et@hotmail.com (David Price); Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:00:59 -0000; Same same..I always run it in a dos window and TR seems quite happy. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.co; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00038.html (8,854 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]