Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+TR\s+vs\.\s+CT\s+features\s+$a\s+wish$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+TR\s+vs\.\s+CT\s+features\s+$a\s+wish$\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:56:33 +0100; Hi all, I used CT last CQWW CW at IO2A M/S (by the way it was a first great experience in a TEAM) (Thanks to BERGHEM Contest Club for inviting me) and I found very useful a couple of indications you; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00160.html (8,346 bytes)
2. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: dl2zav@online.de (Udo Lautenbach DL2ZAV); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 00:08:09 +0100; As far as I know, no. Some information like that sure would be nice. For me, it would be sufficient to have a permanent display of the QSO-per-mult-ratio which is said to be a contest dependent const; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00161.html (8,719 bytes)
3. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: 21 Dec 1999 23:43:41 -0000; I really have a hard time with the value of this feature. Your actual ratio of QSOs to mults at the end of the contest will determine how much time you should spend working a mult. Also, it can be a; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00162.html (8,748 bytes)
4. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 03:56:18 -0600; It was suggested: N6TR responded: and I agree with Tree personally, but sometimes it is at least good to remember that there is a dynamic relationship between the value of mult contacts and plain QSO; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00163.html (9,990 bytes)
5. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: jkulp@shentel.net (Jim Kulp); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:23:59 -0500; This is exactly what I would wish also.....Thanks for verbalizing it.....I end up making a paper one that I scratch off as we go......de Jim K3SW -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.htm; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00164.html (10,462 bytes)
6. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:55:50 +0100; ...... Apologise my question but, who is judging things are most important than other?? You? Of course, no offense intended here as well! Bob,I2WIJ - J49WI mailto:i2wij@qsl.net http://www.qsl.net/i2w; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00165.html (8,407 bytes)
7. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: mcondon@ibm.net (Mike Condon); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:34:03 -0500; Just a little added to the comments already entered. When you are in a contest situation where one part of the country is "Open" and others not, (10M) I often look to the state/Mult list to see what; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00166.html (11,068 bytes)
8. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:27:59 -0600; Not at all, Roberto. Tree is the one guy who makes the final decision. I am merely using the opportunity of this forum which he has given us to test another idea, as did you in the first place. To q; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00167.html (9,507 bytes)
9. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: LRod@pobox.com (LRod@pobox.com); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:21:16 -0000; <italic><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>> Of significantly more value to me, for instance, would be arranging the </italic></color>I solved this a couple of years ago for my operations. Not exact; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00168.html (10,614 bytes)
10. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: eraub@hotmail.com (Eric Raub); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:37:45 -0600; I think this would be a great feature, Mark. This would especially be helpful with NAQP. I'd like to throw out one more addition to the wishlist. I would like to see a dumb terminal added into TRLog; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00169.html (11,442 bytes)
11. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:16:42 -0600; of in way list This is what I meant when I said "Boy will I feel stupid if this has already been addressed." That may well be the case and Tree is quietly reading everything and just rolling his eyes; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00170.html (9,434 bytes)
12. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: Clive_Whelan@compuserve.com (Clive Whelan); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:26:49 -0500; << but I had to try to talk you guys out of it first. >> No chance! It is a highly desirable feature imo. I use it all the time, but have to do mental arithmetic for the purpose. One could have all s; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00173.html (8,334 bytes)
13. [TRLog] TR vs. CT features (a wish) (score: 1): Author: juho.salonen@nic.fi (Juho Salonen); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 19:37:30 +0200; Wish list just gets longer and longer and ... Another usefull thing for single band multi mode contests would be some display which displays mults which are worked in cw but not in ssb and reverse. I; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00187.html (8,692 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]