- 1. [TRLog] WAE (score: 1)
- Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk)
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 23:02:02 -0500
- Another "wowzers" to TrLog: First time I've done WAE in years, and first time with the program. The QTC's are almost spooky, they're so easy! Makes me wanna do this contest seriously! 73, Jim N9JF
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00032.html (5,994 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] WAE (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 06:57:13 -0800 (PST)
- Mark Well, some progress has been made with WAE stuff. This will be in the upcoming 6.36 release. Bugs: 1) TR will send DUPLICATE QTC's if there are zero point QSO's in the log (e.g. dupes) and the p
- /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00043.html (8,366 bytes)
- 3. [Trlog] WAE (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Wetzel" <mjwetzel@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:24:27 -0400
- FWIW I just sent in my Cabrillo log plus the other 2 files required and got a very good quality report. The only ? was my score in the Cabrillo did not match the score from the log (224K vs. 1.2M) so
- /archives//html/TRLog/2012-08/msg00005.html (6,839 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Trlog] WAE (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:26:09 -0500
- I used 6.96 this weekend. The interface worked great, although after sending QTCs, I wasn't sure why the call sign remained in the window. After each batch, I hit <Enter>, Y, Esc, and my TU message.
- /archives//html/TRLog/2012-08/msg00006.html (7,661 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Trlog] WAE (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Schmidt <w9cf@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:11:54 -0700
- I used my linux port which is based on 6.76. While I cannot change the speed during the "QTC #/# QRV?" message, I can change it any time after that both during and between the QTCs. 73 Kevin w9cf ___
- /archives//html/TRLog/2012-08/msg00009.html (7,358 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu