- 1. [TRLog] WAE QTC receiving (score: 1)
- Author: dl2zav@online.de (Udo Lautenbach DL2ZAV)
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:25:55 +0200
- Von: Paul Hicks, VE3BBH / VE3ZT For me too it was the first real attempt, so I can't speak for more experienced ops. Well, it really is a challenge. I'm not an excellent op anyway, but tried to do my
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-08/msg00074.html (8,741 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] WAE QTC receiving (score: 1)
- Author: ua9cdc@dialup.mplik.ru (Igor Sokolov)
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:27:02 +0600
- to Look at the last year SSB results. UA9XL claimed the multiplier of 722(impossible even with 4000 qso) with only 276 QSO made and no log checker noticed that. In fact I doubt all logs are carefull
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-08/msg00076.html (8,134 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] WAE QTC receiving (score: 1)
- Author: Clive_Whelan@compuserve.com (Clive Whelan)
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:33:25 -0400
- Hi Udo, << Wouldn't it make sense if the software automatically sent QTCs a bit slower than the QSO text? Maybe also simply double spaces between time, call and number could help keep up with full sp
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-08/msg00078.html (8,630 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] WAE QTC receiving (score: 1)
- Author: Clive_Whelan@compuserve.com (Clive Whelan)
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:45:49 -0400
- Udo, Thanks to the SENDCW command, here's how to make a sort of QTC simulator for practice. In POST make an ARRL type log of your WAE log.dat ( or any other with serial numbers), say DL2ZAV.log. Then
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-08/msg00090.html (7,771 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu