Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+WPX\s+rule\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+WPX\s+rule\s+change\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] WPX rule change (score: 1): Author: n4gn@n4gn.com (Tim Totten, N4GN); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:01:33 -0500 (EST); The rule change craze has struck again. I guess someone poll tested the question, and a majority of over-the-hill middle class white guys favored changing the WPX M/S category rules. I wish the polls; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00096.html (8,123 bytes)
2. [TRLog] WPX rule change (score: 1): Author: k1ky@bellsouth.net (Tom Delker); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:25:04 -0600; Yes Tim, this is a problem. We have to contend with this during our Sweepstakes Multi/Ops. It is very difficult for the operators to get the contacts logged quickly sometimes when CQ-ing, but the "mu; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00100.html (7,724 bytes)
3. [TRLog] WPX rule change (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:16:51 -0800; I agree. It seems really wrong to create rules that can't be followed if you are using paper logs. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administr; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00102.html (6,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]