- 1. [TRLog] Wintelnetx & TR (score: 1)
- Author: K2ONP@aol.com (K2ONP@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:17:05 EST
- Gary, I read your e-mail to the cluster regarding getting Wintelnetx talking to Tr. As per your suggestion, I also found it critical to have the COM port on the Windows machine and the COM port on th
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00059.html (7,270 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] Wintelnetx & TR (score: 1)
- Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand)
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:38:03 -0500
- Geo, See interspersed. I do not recall having a problem in this area. I'm sure I'm not on the most current version of Wintelnetx and I don't recall if there were differences in this area. What my doc
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00060.html (9,432 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] Wintelnetx & TR (score: 1)
- Author: na2na@earthlink.net (William Liporace)
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:15:18 -0500
- Hi Folks, With a few changes in station and schedule, I am now trying to get ready for the contest. I have a couple of issues with the packet window and the talking to the cluster. I am pretty sure i
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-02/msg00012.html (6,807 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] Wintelnetx & TR (score: 1)
- Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand)
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:11:31 -0500
- I did much of the work getting Wintelnetx and TR to talk with each other at a multi/multi station nearby. As I recall, it was very critical to have TR and Wintelnetx both using the same set of serial
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-02/msg00014.html (9,339 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu