Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+parallel\s+port\s+address\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+parallel\s+port\s+address\s+problem\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1): Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson); Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:53:55 -0500; Once again I would like to thank all who responded to my query, both on and off list. I believe the consensus of responses is that TRLog will not run well in the XP environment. I don't think this is; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00000.html (6,267 bytes)
2. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1): Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson); Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:05:42 -0500; Sorry for the incomplete post... I was able to get the machine booted up using a Win98 boot up disk and got a long warning regarding the hard drive's lack of a FAT or FAT32 structure. The boot up dis; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00001.html (6,532 bytes)
3. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1): Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson); Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:46:28 -0500; I have recovered from my embarrassment re the "ALT-ENTER" episode, and now I have another issue which I hope you guys can help me with. I'm actually ahead this time, trying to make sure that everythi; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00118.html (8,566 bytes)
4. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1): Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson); Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:21:39 -0500; Well, the preliminary results are in and once again it looks like Windows XP has reared its ugly head with regards to TRLog. I hate XP. The emerging consensus is that running TRLog on an XP machine i; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00119.html (6,986 bytes)
5. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1): Author: rbrandon@austin.ibm.com (Robert Brandon); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:43:05 -0500; Re-formatting and re-partitioning are a lot of work. Here's something to consider. If your drive is formatted with the FAT file system and not the NTFS file system (select your C drive in my computer; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00125.html (8,205 bytes)
6. FW: [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1): Author: rbrandon@austin.ibm.com (Robert Brandon); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:22:26 -0500; FYI, we use this technique at a multi-op station where the owner didn't want to futz with his normal Windows boot process and didn't want complicated instructions for ops who might need to reboot in; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00129.html (8,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]