Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+v6\.36\s+and\s+Kenwood\s+TS\-940\s+RIT\s+control\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+v6\.36\s+and\s+Kenwood\s+TS\-940\s+RIT\s+control\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] v6.36 and Kenwood TS-940 RIT control (score: 1): Author: joe.carvalho@mci.com (Joe Carvalho); Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 11:24:56 -0700; --==_247503951==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" When I use the shift buttons on the keyboard for rit control, the TS-940 scrolls up/down as much as it wants. Hitting escape does no; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-02/msg00000.html (7,946 bytes)
2. [TRLog] v6.36 and Kenwood TS-940 RIT control (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:37:04 -0800 (PST); I think what you are seeing is that the ts-940 is slow to respond to commands - if you quiclkiy tap the shift key the RIT will move a very little bit. I have always found the RIT control to be poor; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-02/msg00001.html (8,013 bytes)
3. [TRLog] v6.36 and Kenwood TS-940 RIT control (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 12:54:22 -0600; The TS-950 is also pretty good, although, like with the 940, small taps are better than 'hold and slide.' Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contest; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-02/msg00002.html (7,405 bytes)
4. [TRLog] v6.36 and Kenwood TS-940 RIT control (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:25:24 -0800 (PST); The 940 doesn't keep up as fast as the 850. What you are probably seeing is overshoot. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative re; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-02/msg00003.html (7,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]