Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+$Say\s+73\s+to$\s+60M\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+$Say\s+73\s+to$\s+60M\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M (score: 1): Author: ke5c@hot.rr.com (john, ke5c); Date: Thu May 15 23:03:43 2003; Considering who is behind the the four objecting comments - United Power Line council (UPLC), Power Line Carrier Association (PLCA), Homeplug Powerline Alliance (Homeplug), and The National Telecomm; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00443.html (7,339 bytes)
2. [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Fri May 16 06:55:57 2003; John, I believe the organizations you list above were objecting to the 135/136 kHz assignment, not 60M... 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00471.html (6,914 bytes)
3. [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M (score: 1): Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Fri May 16 07:18:55 2003; We have nobody but the NTIA to thank for our 60 meter chanalized frequencies ..... it is obvious who had the suck power and who the FCC reacted to if you read the report. W6RU; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00473.html (7,746 bytes)
4. [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M (score: 1): Author: ke5c@hot.rr.com (john, ke5c); Date: Fri May 16 11:51:04 2003; they may have objected to 135/136 also, but paragraphs 26 through 30 are under the "5250-5400 kHz Band (RM-10209)" section. paragraph 26 begins "In opposition, the United Power Line council (UPLC) a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00478.html (6,903 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]