Attachments automatically get stripped on QTH forums. There is a good chance the connector is a Type C. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Mellema" <mellema@qis.net> To: <boatanchors@mailma
It is definitely NOT a type C. Type C is the same size as type N but is a bayonet instead of threaded connector (a maxi BNC, so to speak). Type C is my absolute favorite coax connector. It would appe
Well the type connector that i have on a piece of RG-17 is anAmphenol 82-325 which translates to either the HN or C, not sure which. So many connectors, so many names, so little time! The above conne
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:32:27 -0600
Not by the picture. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:34:03 -0600
Its not that one either, its coplanar, the center socket is flush with the outer and the dielectric is flush too. Its not LC. I've adapted LC. Its a Bird design, I think. 73, Jerry, K0CQ ____________
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:46:51 -0600
Google search failed me. But my vintage Amphenol catalog in the file drawer A to B showed on page 25 that 82-325 is an HN connector. It has bigger parts all around and a different interface from N or
The LC was the used on RG-17 Carl KM1H . . -- Original Message -- From: LARRY D GODEK To: k2gkk@hotmail.com ; km1h@jeremy.mv.com ; mellema@qis.net ; boatanchors@mailman.qth.net ; tentec@contesting.co
Carl, There were many connectors used on RG-17. I use RG-17 for my main feedline with HN connectors. The Amphenol catalog RF-2 is a good source of information. That was published in the 70s.. The fir