Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[Orion\]\s+\"Technical\s+Correspondence\"\,\s+August\s+2007\s+issue\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Mike K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:48:07 -0000
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00334.html (10,930 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Mike K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:50:20 -0000
This is a joke, right? Mike _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00335.html (10,550 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Gates, KD3JF" <pearly732003@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Mike that is the problem with the 706 having VHF, UHF. If I had a radio which was for 160-10 I would be happy. You know why I feel that way? I am not an engineer! I am not a complainer. I have a 706
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00341.html (11,218 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:49:13 -0600
Since in VHF circles the 706 has a reputation for an ineffective noise blanker, I went with the Yaesu 857D that does have an effective noise blanker. In it I find the 500 Hz mechanical filter is bett
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00342.html (10,937 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Mike K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:50:43 -0000
Paul, I hit "send" too fast. My real reply should be in the achieve. I'm definitely against a Ten Tec "do it all" radio (vhf, uhf, 220, 1.2 gig). Someone was complaining that there 706 did it all and
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00343.html (12,159 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
-- "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net> wrote: the various ham audio cards for work fast The trend is to shift away from consumer sound cards for this purpose. The HPSDR Janus board an
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00349.html (15,770 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:55:32 -0600
The narrow roofing filter takes work away from the DSP and hobbles the DSP at the same time when noise reduction is desired. That's because most noise reduction algorithms work by comparing coherent
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00355.html (20,281 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Gates, KD3JF" <pearly732003@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
I agree with you Mike. On my 706 I have never used VHF, UHF, and 6 meters. I have a stand alone 2 meter rig and that is what I use on 2 meters. Paul Mike K9MI <k9mi@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Paul, I hit
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00359.html (12,803 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu