Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[Orion\]\s+O2\s+versus\s+Orion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+\[Orion\]\s+O2\s+versus\s+Orion\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:05:30 -0500; No, the ADC sampling frequency was independent of the TCXO, and as a consequence, all DSP-related RX/TX frequencies were independent of the TCXO. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00326.html (7,904 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:40:57 -0600; My experience tells me that there is a concernable difference in ones ability to audibility and accurately "zero beat" a given signal. Unless one can observe the difference in beat of the two signals; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00327.html (10,740 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:46:58 -0500; I can get two tones easily less than one hertz apart by listening to the beats as long as the two tones are close in amplitude. What you actually hear is the phase between the two tones gradually cha; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00328.html (12,257 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "John T. Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:13:04 -0600; Do you guys also calibrate the speedometers in your cars to plus or minus 1/10th of 1 percent? The more I read on this reflector, the more I can't believe I can be satisfied with my 'old' Orion. My e; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00330.html (11,445 bytes)
5. [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:51:17 -0500; beats as long as the two tones are close in amplitude. What you actually hear is the phase between the two tones gradually changing, not the frequency of the beat note. In this manner you can get muc; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00332.html (7,324 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "gary" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:41:24 -0500; That's right. Any piano tuner does this when he tunes your piano. Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00334.html (13,563 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "John T. Fleming" <W3GQJ@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:02:21 -0500; John, I plan on keeping my Orion I. I saw a comment by Carl, N4PY, saying that the Orion I with mods will be 99% of an Orion II. I just wish they would finish the software for the Orion II so they ca; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00335.html (8,694 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:42:41 -0600; I can. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00366.html (13,428 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:55:17 -0600; With all due respect to Bill, I think the ability to detect "zero beat", or to detect differences between two tones, has very little to do with the acuity of one's hearing. It has to do with somethin; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00389.html (9,541 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:37:35 EST; My experience tells me that there is a concernable difference in ones ability to audibility and accurately "zero beat" a given signal. Unless one can observe the difference in beat of the two signals; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00390.html (9,917 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:50:09 -0500; It depends on how you do it. In Orion's case sub-Hz accuracy is achieved easily by beating two tones of similar amplitudes, that is, the SPOT tone and the received signal's tone. No S meter is needed; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00396.html (7,023 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:57:01 -0500; One listens not to the two tones, in an effort to discriminate them, but rather to the slow "thrummmm thrummmmm...." that repeats at very low speeds when you get the tones close. That is, the amplitu; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00400.html (12,998 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:37:57 -0500; With equal amplitudes we have: COS (x) + COS (y) = 2 * COS ((x + y) / 2) * COS ((x - y) / 2) Example: freq 1 = 800.10 Hz freq 2 = 800.00 Hz what one hears is an 800.05 Hz tone with its amplitude vary; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00402.html (7,995 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]