Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+1\.370\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+1\.370\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Josh Kelly" <jkelly@HiWAAY.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 19:43:45 -0500; All is well in Alabama. 9408 lines and 9397 sent to Orion in 305 sec. 73 Josh N4VB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00573.html (6,532 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:26:56 -0400; Hmmm....Josh, mine said 9804 lines sent to the Orion in 289 seconds??? Wonder what the difference may be! Tom - W4BQF All is well in Alabama. 9408 lines and 9397 sent to Orion in 305 sec. 73 Josh N4V; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00578.html (7,421 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:57:51 -0500; Good show Josh! I'm going to wait until I have "mastered" the current version before I try anything new. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ All is well in Alabama. 9408 lines and 9397 sent to Orion in 305 sec. 73 J; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00584.html (7,398 bytes)
4. [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Dave ke7gi" <ke7gi@ke7gi.com>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:50:45 -0700; 1.370 seems to work fine here-although I haven't tried every single feature. Voice recorder seems fine. 73, Dave ke7gi _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@conte; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00925.html (6,850 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 02:22:54 -0000; Version 1.370 is fine except if you are controlling the radio from a program. The serial port response is much worse on 1.370. If you are controlling the Orion from a program, you should go back to v; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00926.html (8,107 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Bill Lathan" <ak5k@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 21:29:01 -0500; Thanks for posting this, Carl. I noticed that the tuning using your program under 1.370 is just unacceptable; this explains the reason. I think I will go back to 1.369. Bill, AK5K ___________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00927.html (7,962 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:44:07 -0600; boy have you got that right Carl ...LOGic7 and 1.370 don't like each other jack ak7o _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00929.html (8,772 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]