Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+2054\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:44:04 -0500
Yes, the core is stable with this firmware, but operationally it is a mess. Many of the operational features of the1.xxx firmware that were so great are now gone, and bugs galore for sure. Lots of wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00702.html (7,660 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:33:23 -0600
Apparently you didn't read the FAQ. Ver 2.x is the base for all future development. Also, have you documented the bugs you've found to "ditsnbits"? We need to do that to get them working on fixes. Ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00705.html (7,473 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:44:11 -0600
For the record, I'm not knocking your opinion. But it is at least advertised as a "beta", and that should be a clue as to it's "fit and finish". Beta software from big guns who do NOTHING but softwa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00707.html (8,074 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:15:30 -0700
Does Ten-Tec publish or make available, a running bug-list so that the users (not just the beta testers), can determine whether a particular idiosyncrasy has already been reported? It would certainly
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00724.html (7,894 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:11:40 -0500
An opinion way off center, and then go away and refuse to talk about it ? I think we don't need this behavior on the reflector. I want to about 2054. In my opinion it should never have been released
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00726.html (7,832 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:00:54 -0500
Was playing with the new beta release last night and noticed that, on cw and wearing headphones, after pressing the cw key the receiver does not come back on. I get no further receive audio. I can st
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00789.html (7,427 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:48:04 EST
That is an odd result. It doesn't happen here. I would try reinstalling and another master reset. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00790.html (6,976 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:39 -0700
I use cw on headphones *only* and have no such trouble with 2.054. Bob NW8L Was playing with the new beta release last night and noticed that, on cw and wearing headphones, after pressing the cw key
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00806.html (8,195 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu