Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+217\s+Filter\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 217 Filter question (score: 1)
Author: bigmack@nortexinfo.net (Robert)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 21:52:23 -0500
Well, I have the 217 in N-1 and 218 in N-2... The N-2 setting makes a very distinct difference in the overall filtering of the Omni VI+, but when I put in N-1 (217) I can hear zero difference.. I hav
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00117.html (7,251 bytes)

2. [TenTec] 217 Filter question (score: 1)
Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 23:06:02 -0400
Use N-1 in conjunction with PBT and you will hear the difference. 73, de Joe AA4NN On Mon, 04 Oct 1999 21:52:23 -0500 Robert <bigmack@nortexinfo.net> writes: and as per to -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00119.html (7,410 bytes)

3. [TenTec] 217 Filter question (score: 1)
Author: vbbond@ix.netcom.com (vbbond@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 20:24:46 -0700
Robert: My setup is exactly backwards of yours: I have the 218 in N1 and the 217 in N2. On CW I note a distinct difference between the two. The 500Hz TT217 is very narrow and the 1.8KHz TT218 is sque
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00120.html (7,882 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu