Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+318\s+and\s+qsk\-5\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:32:24 -0500
Tentec friends, I am looking for help comparing the TenTec 318 with the Ameritron QSK-5. Has anyone used either/both of these who could offer some insights? Thanks and 73 Mike W2IY __________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00037.html (6,809 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 22:22:31 +0100
Mike, these are two totally different animals. The QSK-5 speeds up the amp switching, while the 318 slows it down. Both solutions can work, but it also depends a bit on the amp and how fast its relay
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00041.html (8,067 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:37:28 -0500
Hi Rick, sorry, I forgot to include that the rigs are Corsair II and Johnson Courier or Thunderbolt. Was hoping to use the amp with QSK. 73 Mike Mike, these are two totally different animals. The QSK
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00043.html (8,706 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:20:11 -0600
Since the Thunderbolt has no internal RF switching or relays this should be easy to accomplish but with an external RF switching system. However, you will need to arrange a method to switch the inern
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00044.html (10,182 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 09:10:03 +0100
GM Mike, I think I will pass on this one. This is not going to be a PLUG'n'Play solution. Bob seems to know them. I 'remember' seeing them when I was a kid, but I left the states soon after that and
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00045.html (11,006 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 07:27:53 -0600
To touch on the point, unless the Thunderbolt has been modified, there is no switching or relays inside the amp. The input connector goes direct to the input selector switch which then goes to the in
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00047.html (14,692 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 23:07:29 +0100
The reason that the amp had no T/R relay is, there were no transceivers back then. We had separate receivers and transceivers. Antenna switching was always done external to the transmitter. Transmitt
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00052.html (8,508 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: denton sprague <denton@oregontrail.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:13:49 -0800
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00053.html (9,529 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:44:56 -0500
..., they weight in at some 135 lbs. ... ...and one won't need to worry about the desk moving around when sending aggressive CW. _______________________________________________ I would hope not! :-0
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00065.html (8,377 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: denton sprague <denton@oregontrail.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:18:22 -0800
we had a cat that loved the top of that receiver on a cold winters day.but she kept getting her claws hung up on the top covers vent holes. Called her our "excess filament heat absorption unit". I re
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00069.html (9,582 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 19:18:01 -0600
Nothing like class AB1 or AB2 push pull audio from a pair of 6V6GT's. 73 Bob, K4TAX we had a cat that loved the top of that receiver on a cold winters day.but she kept getting her claws hung up on th
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00071.html (10,627 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Frank A. Ellis" <w3uhf@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:31:30 -0500
Good memories. My first HF rig was an HT-37 with the SX-101 . . . both were back breakers, so I didn't move them around very much. Replaced the SX-101 with a 75A-4 and sure wish I had that one back.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00073.html (10,387 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:23:27 +0100
My dream was to build an amp with 4x 1625's in push-pull parallel. At the end of the day, I built the amp with 3x 811a instead - straight out of the Handbook. 73 Rick, DJ0IP Nothing like class AB1 or
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00074.html (10,985 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:03:49 -0500
I still have my old Johnson TR switch and it worked beautifully! Dead silent and wonderful QSK. Gary KA1J -- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00075.html (10,051 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:33:47 -0600
When shortly after being licensed in 1959, I built an amp with four 6DQ5 sweep tubes. These were in a parallel and push-pull configuration. I drove the control grids in push-pull and the plates were
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00076.html (12,870 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:43:18 -0500
I don't have an old amp design that I have brought to live, but I did recently drag home an 80's vintage Motorola paging transmitter with a nice two tube (8560AS') amp to possibly convert to a six me
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00077.html (14,324 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:25:27 -0500
My thanks to all who replied to my plea for help. The thread got a little off-topic there toward the end, but still interesting. Bottom line seems to be I am better off with the QSK-5 for my applicat
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00101.html (9,148 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu