Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+450\s+Ohm\s+feedline\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+450\s+Ohm\s+feedline\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:37:49 -0700; Sorry Stuart, that's not the answer to my question. I asked about "Link Coupling", not about symmetrical (or balanced). Especially the MFJ is NOT a true balanced tuner... at least not in my books. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00216.html (9,531 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: "Don" <kd6hq@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:32:29 -0700; Does anyone have the schematics for these tuners? I would think that would be one way to figure it out. I'm only interested because I'm in the middle of trying to figure it all out so I can purchase; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00225.html (11,637 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:22:29 -0400; Yes, even before bundled cable, when long parallel lines were run on the telephone poles, the wire positions on the poles were periodically interchanged. One wire was dropped under the other and cros; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00227.html (9,845 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:29:57 -0500; If one remembers seeing the many "signal lines" that ran along beside of the RR tracks, they had a insulator arrangement with a metal support in the form of an X which was used to swap the conductors; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00228.html (10,807 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:51:49 -0400; The Wireman sells one on a porcelain base. I use one here in the shack. 73, Joe Alfred Lorona wrote: Hi, Mike: Say, where did you find those DPDT knife switches? I've been looking for a source for ye; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00234.html (9,731 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:12:11 -0500; And all the time I thought that this was just an early effort to develop a log periodic system to eliminate the shortening of the first dit when sending over 20WPM!<GRIN> 73, Frank, K4VMO -- Original; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00235.html (11,939 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 08:19:17 -1000; Hey! Maybe this is the solution to BPL interference: Make the power companies twist the power lines! The power companies already do twist their HV transmission lines. Check it out as you are a passen; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00245.html (9,324 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:44:17 -0500; Lest there be some confusion, although power companies twist primary lines, they are putting BPL on Secondary lines that are not twisted, and therefore radiate like blazes. -Stuart K5KVH ____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00284.html (8,434 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:45:06 -1000; Lest there be some confusion, although power companies twist primary lines, they are putting BPL on Secondary lines that are not twisted, and therefore radiate like blazes. Even if the power companie; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00300.html (9,321 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:05:29 -0500; Excellent! point made about power line twist being for low frequencies and not effective at HF! true, true, Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00312.html (8,406 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]