Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+540\s+vs\s+544\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+540\s+vs\s+544\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 540 vs 544 (score: 1): Author: digalbo@erols.com (Dennis DiGalbo); Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 14:35:00 -0400; Hello, and sorry if this question has been answered recently on the reflector ... How does the 540 compare to the 544? Does it have have the same good receive qualities, just with analog tuning? Than; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00224.html (6,695 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 540 vs 544 (score: 1): Author: prvalko@oakland.edu (Paul R. Valko); Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 06:02:43 -0400 (EDT); I dunno how Ten*Tec does it, because the radios seem to be electrically identical, but the 544 has a MUCH better receiver! In fact, you can tell just by looking at it that it must have a better recei; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00230.html (7,755 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]