Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+566\s+v3\.028\s+spot\s+versus\s+SAF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+566\s+v3\.028\s+spot\s+versus\s+SAF\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF (score: 1): Author: "Dave G3RXP" <g3rxp@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:21:41 +0100; Happy Easter all When I tune a CW station in using the SPOT control and then listen to that station with the 50Hz SAF in I have to re-tune with the RIT to peak the CW note. It seems to vary but is ar; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00065.html (8,856 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:21:52 +0000; I don't have the issues you're describing on my 565 SAF and it shouldn't have anything to do with your subreceiver type. What would really help is a recording of your SAF in action. A bit of spectral; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00066.html (9,992 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF (score: 1): Author: "Dave G3RXP" <g3rxp@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:46:20 +0100; -- Original Message -- If you can make such a recording (WAV or mp3), just tune to a carrier, Thanks Barry, I will give it a go - it might take a while Hi... 73 Dave _________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00067.html (11,187 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:55:23 -0400 (EDT); As best I can tell by ear, the difference between my (566 v3.028) spot and SAF is 2 Hz. That is with SPOT at 350 Hz, STEP at 1 Hz and SAF W at 10 Hz. 73 Ray W2RS _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00070.html (7,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]