Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+60M\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: cherry@getnet.net (Jim FitzSimons)
Date: Thu May 15 18:21:04 2003
31. We believe that frequencies in the 5250-5400 kHz range may be useful for completing disaster communications links at times when the 3 and 7 MHz bands are not available due to ionospheric conditio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00414.html (9,966 bytes)

2. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: ham@w3eax.umd.edu (Scott Rosenfeld [N7JI])
Date: Thu May 15 20:37:52 2003
MADness. Guess we'd better build our rockbound rigs. -- Scott Rosenfeld ARS N7JI 541-684-9970 Eugene, OR Land o' much rain If you find me on the air, I'm probably in my car ham@w3eax.umd.edu http://w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00431.html (11,210 bytes)

3. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: ewell2@cvc.net (Mail)
Date: Thu May 15 21:14:00 2003
Hi All: I thought that we all had homeland responsibilities also, and we are FCC licensed? You know that we will not be able to work mobile, and our equipment will have to be crystal controlled? Spec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00432.html (12,519 bytes)

4. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Thu May 15 21:27:40 2003
Where did the idea of "rock-bound" and crystals come from? 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE "In the 57th year and it
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00433.html (8,660 bytes)

5. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: csegar@mindspring.com (Cliff)
Date: Thu May 15 21:54:34 2003
Huh? At the 50w ERP level (referenced to a dipole driven with 50w PEP with a loss-less feed line) it would seem quite reasonable that few mobile antennas would come close to this power level - especi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00436.html (8,466 bytes)

6. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: wmarvin@hickorytech.net (Bill KB9IV)
Date: Thu May 15 22:04:44 2003
Looks like 60 Meter CB to me? Bill KB9IV
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00437.html (9,318 bytes)

7. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: ham@w3eax.umd.edu (Scott Rosenfeld [N7JI])
Date: Thu May 15 22:53:33 2003
If they're telling us exactly where to be, that's channelization - and it's easier to use xtals :) -- Scott Rosenfeld ARS N7JI 541-684-9970 Eugene, OR Land o' much rain If you find me on the air, I'm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00438.html (9,632 bytes)

8. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: wb2vuf@qsl.net (Bwana Bob)
Date: Thu May 15 23:03:37 2003
Well, actually, on VHF and UHF FM, we've been living with channelized operation for many years. 73, Bob WB2VUF
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00442.html (10,050 bytes)

9. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 23:34:33 2003
Sure you will.... a mobile antenna is a lot less than unity gain... More like -10 dB or more at 5 mHz. why? Perry w8au
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00448.html (8,211 bytes)

10. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri May 16 00:21:02 2003
Well, maybe, but I think that I'll just set the dial to the proper frequency for the center of a 2.8 KHz (or less) occupied bandwidth less 1400 Hz. Haven't used crystals since 1947 when I built my fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00456.html (8,996 bytes)

11. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Fri May 16 00:27:06 2003
Can't work mobile, the rules for 60m prohibit mobile operation. What I've seen so far doesn't give a tolerance on the frequency or specify how to accurately measure the frequency of a suppressed carr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00458.html (8,439 bytes)

12. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser)
Date: Fri May 16 00:39:23 2003
So ... we will be able to run 500 watts mobile on 60 meters ? :>} W6RU
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00459.html (8,322 bytes)

13. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri May 16 01:16:39 2003
Translation: We (ie the FCC) recognize that the amateurs have a legitimate need for frequencies on 60 Meters, but because the NTIA (hiding behind the smoke and mirrors of "homeland security") is afra
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00463.html (13,351 bytes)

14. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: kipg@yorkinternet.net (Kip Glunt)
Date: Fri May 16 02:16:59 2003
I'm curious, when did the center of a Single Sideband signal (presuming it could have an upper or lower sideband) become the specified frequency plus or minus 1400 KHz.? Where did this come from? ...
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00466.html (8,339 bytes)

15. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: kipg@yorkinternet.net (Kip Glunt)
Date: Fri May 16 02:27:25 2003
May I correct "1400 KHz" to "1400 Hz." I'm curious, when did the center of a Single Sideband signal (presuming it could have an upper or lower sideband) become the specified frequency plus or minus 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00467.html (8,461 bytes)

16. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri May 16 02:34:01 2003
The government and the military, in short. They specify frequency in terms of the center frequency of the occupied bandwidth or channel width. Hams use the transmitted frequency for all carrier-prese
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00468.html (9,865 bytes)

17. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri May 16 03:23:27 2003
Boy, I sure hope you can! That was a wowzer of a typo, wasn't it? <:} Funny thing, I did not notice it at all until I re--read your posting. I guess we all sorta knew what you meant . . . Thanks, Kip
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00469.html (8,821 bytes)

18. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: DennisKT5D@aol.com (DennisKT5D@aol.com)
Date: Fri May 16 06:41:19 2003
Having been a ham for over 35 years, I will ignore this band as it is now proposed. I left crystal operation behind long ago as a novice in 1970 and do not intend to return to it now 33 years later.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00470.html (8,534 bytes)

19. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk)
Date: Fri May 16 07:10:59 2003
I could be wrong, but I thought the whole thrust of the ARRL argument to get this frequency assignment was for emergency/hurricane/storm (Caribbean?) communications when propagation was too short/too
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00472.html (8,597 bytes)

20. [TenTec] 60M (score: 1)
Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi)
Date: Fri May 16 07:24:35 2003
Don't forget that most radios don't start the bottom end of the passband at 0. It is usually 200 hertz . So if you are using a 2800 hertz filter and the bottom of the passband is 200 hertz, then your
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00474.html (11,459 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu