Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+6N2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+6N2\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: pfb@eriecoast.com (Paul); Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:00:31 -0400; A couple of friends picked up the new unit in Dayton. Nothing has been posted here yet...... So -- Got a chance to see it and play with it for only a few minutes.... Receive is great. Great layout. S; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00233.html (7,002 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 09:07:39 -0700; FINALLY! I've been waiting over two years to get one! Anyone know the price? The TT web site indicates $696, which is a very good price and about one hundred dollars less than the original estimate.; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00234.html (7,953 bytes)
3. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: JBeamer@PanAmSat.com (Beamer, Jay); Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 17:43:22 -0400; Hello All, There's now a picture of the 6N2 on the TT web site. It's a bit better than the one we've seen so far. Thanks Stan. J/KM6VX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissio; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00175.html (6,843 bytes)
4. [TenTec] 6n2 (score: 1): Author: Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com (Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com); Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 13:44:56 -0400; Looked at the basic information on the TT website, but two questions linger...and it appears the answers aren't going to be good.... 1. Will this radio be computer controlled? For those of us who ope; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00236.html (7,109 bytes)
5. [TenTec] 6n2 (score: 1): Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com); Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 13:15:28 -0500; Related to your question #2, I asked Scott if this radio would be set up to support 9600 bps packet, and he said it would not. I suspect that says the answer is NO to item 2. 73, Duane AC5AA Duane A.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00237.html (8,109 bytes)
6. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: JBeamer@PanAmSat.com (Beamer, Jay); Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:07:36 -0400; Hello All, Does anyone still have those closeup photos of the 6N2, and if so, would you mind posting them to the reflector? A friend of mine wants to take a peek at them and I deleted my copies. Than; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00352.html (6,394 bytes)
7. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: W2BJ <barry@w2bj.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:12:46 -0500; I am considering buying the 6N2. I am primarily a QRP CW operator. I occasionally check into 2 meter nets. I have been wanting to get on 6 meters and thought that this rig might be a good combination; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00464.html (6,889 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: YASH@aol.com; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:52:17 -0500; Barry go for the 6n2,have one and its a great little rig. Just enought power to do things and VERY easy to add a amp.Don't buy it used, people tend to play with them. Call tentec and see if they have; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00465.html (6,401 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:38:53 +0000; Barry, the 6n2 is a very GOOD basic all mode. It's tiny size may be a bit off putting, but it has just about supplanted the FT736R, and the IC 271, 274 and 810 Icom's that are gathering dust in my sh; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00466.html (7,598 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: Dave Sublette <k4to@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:56:52 -0500; for the record...I did intend this to go to all. I had a 6N2. I found the CW keying and SSB PTT arrangement very awkward, especially when using it as an IF rig for other transverters. I had many conv; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00467.html (8,194 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: W9efl@aol.com; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:06:12 EST; Another input although not new. How did we end up with such an clumsy transverter interface when it is a natural for this function????? 73 NOEL _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00470.html (6,981 bytes)
12. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: W2BJ <barry@w2bj.com>; Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 23:28:42 -0400; I have been considering buying a Ten Tec 6N2. Please give me your input regarding the quality of that rig. I operate mostly CW QRP. I want to try 6 meters and occasionally go on 2. Thanks for the inf; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00017.html (6,340 bytes)
13. [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: Paul Henning <paul@amtelco.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:49:11 -0500; I need to purchase a VHF rig and am wondering if any one out there has any experience with the TT Mod. 526 6N2 transceiver they would care to share? Paul N. Henning K9PH Director of Research and Deve; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00602.html (7,052 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:41:28 -0500; Paul, I just sold mine. It was an excellent radio. The controls are not as 'slick' as the JA rigs. I liked it a lot - especially that I could run 6m on my untuned-on-6m G5RV Jr., and it would still p; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00607.html (8,422 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:57:48 -0400; Paul, I have a 6N2. If you are looking primarily for a 2m FM radio for repeater work, I wouldn't recommend it. The FM performance is not up to that of current 2m FM mobile rigs (which can be bought f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00608.html (8,721 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:33:08 -0500; No experience with TT VHF gear, but there is a glowing review of the Elecraft 2m transverter in the new QST, and the price looks good. Put this with an Omni or Orion! and you would have a world class; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00615.html (7,274 bytes)
17. [TenTec] 6n2 (score: 1): Author: "Jack Emerson" <w4tje@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:12:26 -0400; I'm looking for a Ten Tec 6n2 Transceiver. Must be from a smoker only, preferably Winstons. I'm kicking myself for not buying one new before it was discontinued. Pse contact me at w4tje@earthlink.net; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00276.html (6,838 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] 6n2 (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:46:23 -0400; everybody knows that Marlboro-smoked radios are better. (smile) Ron wb1hga "the 516 is a keeper" _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00290.html (7,649 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] 6n2 (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:35:26 -0400; I'd make a bid if you can supply proof of a completed smoke operation. Everyone knows that electronics will work again if you replace the smoke you let out. John / WA1JG _____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00307.html (8,352 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] 6n2 (score: 1): Author: k4qhn@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:17:46 -0400; Is a TenTec 6n2 the same as a TenTec Model 526 Transceiver.? If so I got the rig you got the Money?? No smoks Bill Quigley I'm looking for a Ten Tec 6n2 Must be from a smoker only, preferably Winston; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00444.html (8,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]