Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+707\s+Mike\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+707\s+Mike\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 707 mike (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:19:08 -0500; Finally got an antenna up (temporarily) so I put the Jupiter on the air for the first time (for me) last night. The hand mike seemed to work better than the 707, and I'm sure it's not setup correctly; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00342.html (6,805 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] 707 mike (score: 1): Author: "William Losey" <flightstar@zoominternet.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:09:22 -0400; Go into the program mode, scroll down (below what's shown on the screen) set the "mic in boost" at 12dB.that shoud do it. If you don't like what you see on the ALC light crank the "mic in boost" up o; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00343.html (8,589 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 707 mike (score: 1): Author: "James C. Owen, III" <k4cgy_list@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:39:49 -0700 (PDT); Hi Bill, My Jupiter doesn't have a "mic in boost" is this something new in the latest software? 73 Jim K4CGY _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00349.html (9,650 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] 707 mike (score: 1): Author: "William Losey" <flightstar@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:24:36 -0400; Jim are you sure that you kept scrolling down the "mnu"? There are more options than can be displayer on one screen full. If you are still unable to see the "mic in Boost" option your software may ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00365.html (11,519 bytes)
5. [TenTec] 707 Mike (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:10:28 EDT; Hi, My new 707 mike arrived today and I've been playing with it. The audio sounds fine on the Orion II monitor with EQ set to 0 dB as per the instructions, but I find that it needs quite a bit more g; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00418.html (7,063 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] 707 Mike (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:40:38 -0400; That makes perfect sense to me, as I believe your new microphone has a dynamic type of microphone element, whereas you indicate your previous microphone has an electret condenser type element. Dynami; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00422.html (8,295 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 707 Mike (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:26:32 EDT; Tnx for the info. Further experimentation shows that I can back off the mic gain to 55 or 60 on SSB, but it still wants 75 or so on AM. If I go past +12 dB of H/W mic gain, it begins to sound distort; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00425.html (9,078 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] 707 Mike (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:03:08 -0400; I sent my 707 back yhe 709 705 was nutch better.I mean mutch mutch mutch better. Rod -- Original Message -- From: <Rsoifer@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:26 PM; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00426.html (10,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]