Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+756PRO\/OMNI\'s\s+\-\s+noise\s+level\s+and\s+comfort\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+756PRO\/OMNI\'s\s+\-\s+noise\s+level\s+and\s+comfort\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 756PRO/OMNI's - noise level and comfort (score: 1): Author: cyr999@extremezone.com (cyr999@extremezone.com); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:05:42 -0700 (MST); Hi folks - As I continue my side-by-side A/B test of my OMNI V.9 and a new ICOM 756PRO I am beginning to wonder if the overall noise level on the 756 is somewhat higher than the OMNI and if the "dsp"; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00225.html (7,201 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 756PRO/OMNI's - noise level and comfort (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:22:28 -0600; Tim, as long as you listen to the PRO receiver with either phones or speaker through the crappy internal analog audio system you will not be getting anywhere near the sound that radio is capable of p; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00228.html (8,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]