Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+9\s+MHz\s+filter\s+gain\s+jumpers\s+on\s+OMNI\s+VI\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+9\s+MHz\s+filter\s+gain\s+jumpers\s+on\s+OMNI\s+VI\+\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 9 MHz filter gain jumpers on OMNI VI+ (score: 1): Author: chicks@ix.netcom.com (Charlie Hicks); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:27:55 -0600; I recently acquired a used OMNI VI+ and ordered the 2.8 kHz filter from INRAD. The Omni has a gain jumper for the two 9 MHz filter slots. Should the high or low gain jumper be set for the new INRAD 2; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00401.html (7,320 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 9 MHz filter gain jumpers on OMNI VI+ (score: 1): Author: troy_wideman@eee.org (Troy Wideman); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 17:36:18 -0800; Charlie, I don't know what the others have done, but, I placed the 2.8 filter in the standard filter's slot and moved the standard filter to N-1, then moved my optional 1.8 filter to N-2. The jumpers; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00403.html (8,214 bytes)
3. [TenTec] 9 MHz filter gain jumpers on OMNI VI+ (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:01:56 -0800; You plan to put the 2.8 KHz filter in the "option" slot? If you want the (possible) improvement in your CW note, this 2.8 KHz filter goes in place of the model 220, the main filter, where there is no; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00404.html (7,528 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]