Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\/B\s+rig\s+testing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\/B\s+rig\s+testing\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "Paul DeWitte" <k9ot@yousq.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:46:54 -0600; I did a little bit of A/B/C testing on 160M with my Omni VII, Peg's Eagle, and my Corsair II. I am not happy with the results. I was listening to Bernie W3UR down in J7 on a beverage. I just hooked t; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00216.html (7,724 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:29:47 +0000; Not many receivers are going to beat a Corsair. Enjoy it, you've obviously got a good one! 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00231.html (9,432 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:34:35 -0800; Several thoughts. First, I've spent a LOT of time trying to evaluate the differences between antennas that are predicted by NEC models to have definite, but small (3-6 dB) differences in their direct; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00232.html (10,170 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:30:47 +0100; BACK TO THE FUTURE? ;-) 73 Rick, DJ0IP I did a little bit of A/B/C testing on 160M with my Omni VII, Peg's Eagle, and my Corsair II. I am not happy with the results. I was listening to Bernie W3UR do; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00233.html (9,111 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:38:11 -0500 (EST); Paul, I was there this morning, listening to Bernie here in Arizona on my Orion II and inverted-L. Conditions were undoubtedly better at your QTH, but out here there was so much QSB that any test I c; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00234.html (9,601 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: James Boswell <ka5siw@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:13:11 -0800 (PST); Paul, I keep a 3-way coax switch on my station at all times. There I can set 3 radios to the same freq. and switch between the radios to do a check of noise, bandwidth filtering and compa; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00236.html (9,914 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:40:12 -0500; Best is to use a switch to switch between radios and listen for more than a few seconds. I did a little bit of A/B/C testing on 160M with my Omni VII, Peg's Eagle, and my Corsair II. I am not happy w; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00237.html (9,166 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:11:26 -0600; There's a reason I keep my CORSAIR-II with its external VFO operating daily; its an excellent radio and it compares favorably to more modern radios from TenTec as demonstrated in Sherwood Engineering; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00238.html (10,223 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Timothy Randa <randaranch@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:20 -0600; Welcome to the reality world of no TT koolaid Paul. I "upgraded" from the Omni VI plus to the Omni VII and knew the moment I turned it on it was a mistake. There will be a dozen guys come in and tell; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00240.html (9,867 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:41 -0500; It is hard to judge from here, without knowing how each rig was set up. But interesting nonetheless. The Omni VII is just another radio if it is not set up right. -- JHR -- I did a little bit of A/B/; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00245.html (8,488 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:10:55 -0600; I agree, I run my OMNI-VII with minimum RF gain to produce audio out of the LINE OUT and with the AF gain set to ZERO. From the OMNI-VII LINE OUT, audio is run through an AOR TD-370 DSP audio filter; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00000.html (8,976 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:35:10 -0600; I'm using an old Omni C as the main station rig, an old Triton IV as backup, a K2 for QRP. Bought an Omni VII when it first came out, it was a very nice radio. Sold it after two years because was har; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00004.html (7,928 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:19:40 +0000; I had some conversations a few years back with Inrad about installing their roofing filter kit in the Corsair 2 but couldn't pin them down on precisely where in the front end it should go. Has anybod; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00005.html (10,912 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: va3dwi@gmail.com; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:05:57 +0000; It may be that I am picky here, but don't roofing filters go in the I.F. after the first mixer instead of the front end? Or are you talking about a different thing. Just being curious. Tony VE73DWI.; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00009.html (12,069 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 02:12:27 -0500; Thank you for saying this better than I could. I tell ya fellers what ... l own both an Omni VII and TS-590s and they are both darned good radios. That said, regardless of the specifications, and reg; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00021.html (9,423 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 04:07:25 -0500; That is exactly why you should keep your current rig and enjoy it without reservation as long as it continues to work. Just like your favorite car. If it does what you want it to do, and is comfortab; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00023.html (10,185 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "W8KZW" <w8kzw@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:37:08 -0500; No, best is an Antenna Multicoupler and listen to multiple radios simultaneously. Jeff W8KZW -... Best is to use a switch to switch between radios and listen for more than a few seconds. ____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00024.html (7,694 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:20:38 +0100; I fully agree with James. People tend to put much too much emphasis on the radio. I think most people are far too concerned with buying new radios and pay far too little attention to their antennas a; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00031.html (11,026 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:25:19 +0100; Jeff, even that is not good enough unless you are running the test on the right day at the right time. Most radios perform well most of the time, as long as the bands are not over-crowded with Califo; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00033.html (9,138 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:16:46 -0600; I agree...and that is what I have done for years with a military RX multicoupler with unity gain between ports. Don't much care about radio settings...the radio that wins is the one that can dig out; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00037.html (9,144 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]