Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\s+risky\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+A\s+risky\s+question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:48:00 -0600; I'm considering buying a new radio, either an Eagle or a K3. Hoping to avoid a flame storm, would appreciate observations from folks who have had opportunity to operate both. Realizing the lab test s; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00211.html (7,179 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:20:04 +0100; Hi Curt, I don't recall the post you referred to. In any case I strongly disagree with the author's conclusion. The Eagle is a great CW rig, one of the best, and mine has full output power on all ban; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00214.html (14,363 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: Bill Harris <w7kxb@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:19:57 -0800; Excellent post Rick. I also prefer the analog S meter over digital. However, how much would that have raise the retail price??? As for operation, I think Ten Tec is on the right track by using the KI; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00218.html (7,459 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:35:32 -0600; The Eagle has a shorter learning curve then the K3. The Eagle is ideal for the older ham whose dexterity is failing, and has trouble remembering how to get to multiple menus, or use too many knobs. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00224.html (8,767 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:23:18 -0500; I like my Omni VII. It has more options and features than the Eagle, and still has a very effective, quiet receiver. Costs more but then it does more. Simple menu, one list, easy to learn. -- K8JHR/A; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00234.html (7,795 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:20 -0800; Curt, I'd suggest that you check out the archives of this list, and also those of the Eagle group on YahooGroups. There were a number of A/B/C comparisons between the Eagle and K3, as well as the TS-; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00243.html (9,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]