- 1. [TenTec] ARGOSY II FEEDBACK (score: 1)
- Author: kerlin@ligtel.com (Ron Kerlin)
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 21:32:30 -0500
- Keith...I believe that this mod does reduce the agc contant a bit, but qsk is still very satisfactory and the overall agc seems to be about right. Popping is much reduced. Unlike my Omni, the Argosy
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00009.html (9,085 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] ARGOSY II FEEDBACK (score: 1)
- Author: ARDUJENSKI@aol.com (ARDUJENSKI@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:41:54 EST
- Hi folks, I was looking for a back-up rig for my OMNI-D and one that was "field friendly" for both QRP/QRO CW and SSB operations (fielddays, RVing). I have read alot of discussions both pro and con o
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00297.html (7,350 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] ARGOSY II FEEDBACK (score: 1)
- Author: kerlin@ligtel.com (Ron Kerlin)
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:32:30 -0500
- Alan...I recently acquired an Argosy II (525D). I first got it as a backup for my base rig, and to use in the field. I do a lot of qrp, and the instant switch to 5 watts is nice. My rig came with a n
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00299.html (9,740 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] ARGOSY II FEEDBACK (score: 1)
- Author: cait.martin@ibm.net (Caitlyn M. Martin)
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 17:13:32 -0500
- Hi, I chose the Argo (basically a five watt Scout) over the Argosy II for the following reasons: -The Scout is quite a bit smaller and lighter. -The Argosy does not cover 12, 17, or 160 meters. 12 an
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00304.html (8,225 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] ARGOSY II FEEDBACK (score: 1)
- Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin)
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 17:28:08 -0500
- -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> of involves Did this mod change the AGC recovery time constant? I've owned several TenTec rigs and have modified all of them to speed up the AGC recovery time. This of
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00315.html (7,704 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu