Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+Review\s+of\s+FT9000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+Review\s+of\s+FT9000\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:53:29 -0500; Yes, yes, you insist on dredging that up. Not everyone, however, finds the same problems. I would certainly hope not. Although, there are many joys in operating HQ-xxx and HT-xxx and Globe-something; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00218.html (8,757 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:14:38 -0400; Tommy makes a good point! There is something to be said and appreciated about a rig that is problem free and just operates each and every day without a burp. It may not have the best specs on receive; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00219.html (10,403 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:33:52 -0500; I totally agree with that. The discussion is truly pointless. Which was my only point. None of us have the same discriminators for what constitutes a "problem" or not, and none of our individual dis; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00220.html (9,246 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:40:12 -0400; You and good big _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00221.html (9,967 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:05:20 -0500; And my cpy of the radio in question has met that criteria in yeoman fashion, thank you. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00223.html (8,473 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:05:20 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00224.html (10,838 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 19:18:06 -0400; Dynamic range expressed in dB does normalize for sensitivity. It is the difference between the sensitivity and the measured degradation. In theory, a rig with a 100 dB IMDDR of 100 dB should still ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00239.html (12,187 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]