Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+Technical\s+Publications\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ARRL Technical Publications (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:07:46 -0800
You are right on, Jerry! I can tell you from direct experience that ARRL HQ is dominated by egos and has FAR less technical expertise than one would like to believe. There is no technical editing of
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00279.html (10,212 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Technical Publications (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:00:14 -0600
Well, the question pools are not ARRL's HQ problem, the National Volunteer Examiners group writes the pools, and approves changes and corrections. Yes, there have been continuing bad questions and an
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00304.html (9,871 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu