Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+proposal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+proposal\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ARRL proposal (score: 1): Author: jkbelt@spiritone.com (Jim and Kate Belt); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:00:16 -0700; Hi All: While this is only marginally related to Ten Tec products it is of MAJOR significance to amateur radio. Please go to the ARRL Website and read the outrageous proposal that they are making to; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00222.html (7,881 bytes)
2. [TenTec] ARRL proposal (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:53:00 -0700; Yeah, and from all the way out here in Oregon I could see the smoke rising from their computer when it received the first of my many to come replies. I guess this would mean Ten Tec will no longer ha; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00224.html (9,099 bytes)
3. [TenTec] ARRL proposal (score: 1): Author: wa5yom@ardmore.com (Tim); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 14:27:23 -0500; Its always nice to know that there are "true extra's" out there to save us all from our ignorance. Yeah, and from all the way out here in Oregon I could see the smoke rising from their computer when; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00225.html (10,030 bytes)
4. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: larrygibbs@ibm.net (Larry Gibbs); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 16:22:54 -0400; This is outcome based education for amateur radio; i.e., more dumbing down. Not only do we have the FCC and the commercial interests to fight, but our own so-called organization who are supposed to b; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00226.html (8,167 bytes)
5. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: pob@vt.edu (Joseph T. Price-O'Brien); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:47:20 -0400; I humbly submit my comments to the T-T reflector. I know that there are some of you who will agree and, no doubt, many who will disagree, but this is an open forum and I am not trying to invite an a; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00227.html (13,453 bytes)
6. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: casey.bahr@intel.com (Bahr, Casey); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 15:36:23 -0700; Joseph, There is a wonderful message in your ham radio story about hard work, perseverance and the pride of accomplishment. I applaud your efforts and enjoyed your relating your viewpoint to us all.; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00229.html (17,508 bytes)
7. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:41:10 -0500; What does this have to do with the Ten-Tec reflector or Ten-Tec Equipment? Please take the ARRL Proposal comments to something more suited to the subject, like a ham radio policy newsgroup or list an; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00230.html (8,470 bytes)
8. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: JDuffy@aol.com (JDuffy@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 11:12:43 EDT; Folks, This is not to start a flame war. But the facts are very simple. CW is becoming more and more an outdated method of communication. In fact, our emotions may have caused amateurs to hang onto t; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00237.html (9,625 bytes)
9. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: casey.bahr@intel.com (Bahr, Casey); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 08:39:28 -0700; Duffy, I have no intention of flaming you (despite your pleas to the contrary) ;) You have to realize first that amateur radio has already been dumbed down and it will only get worse. The current wri; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00238.html (12,322 bytes)
10. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 12:05:44 -0400; I suggest we move the discussion of this proposal off the TenTec reflector which is, after all, for the purpose of discussing TenTec equipment. Thought I'd make the suggestion before the moderator/ow; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00239.html (8,708 bytes)
11. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: nhoop@centuryinter.net (Nat H); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 19:19:47 GMT; I expect that's where he (Duffy) came from(G) 73 Nat KM5QU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00245.html (8,547 bytes)
12. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 15:10:56 -0500; This used to be a good reflector. Now, it's a political soapbox. too bad. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQ; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00250.html (8,337 bytes)
13. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: TTow@Bellsouth.Net (Tommy Tow); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:13:16 -0500; Would someone kindly forward to me the method for removing myself from this reflector? Thanks, Tommy, WD4K I expect that's where he (Duffy) came from(G) 73 Nat KM5QU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00255.html (9,133 bytes)
14. [TenTec] ARRL proposal (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 24 Jul 1998 09:27 EDT; I Like this. We need go gather together and the ARRL about this insanity. That is the only way! I suggest a spam operation. Maybe they will get the message! - Dale, AD4YH Also a true Extra form back; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00263.html (8,702 bytes)
15. [TenTec] ARRL proposal (score: 1): Author: W7TS@ibm.net (Ken Kinyon); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:04:34 -0600; - Dale, AD4YH "Also a true Extra form back in the "early days of wireless". (pre-questoin pool)" To All: I had made up my mind that I would not post anything regarding this discussion. However this; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00266.html (10,687 bytes)
16. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:17:00 -0700; Well stated Casey. CW aside, as a VE I have been very surprised by those people who "struggle" with (and even fail) the written portion of the test, even though it has been made so incredibly easy no; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00271.html (13,396 bytes)
17. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:56:13 -0400 (EDT); Well....fixing ham equipment has become a thing of the past mostly due to the complexity of modern equipment. TenTec gear is by far the easiest to repair but this is coming to a hault with the influ; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00273.html (9,251 bytes)
18. [TenTec] ARRL Proposal (score: 1): Author: pob@vt.edu (Joseph T. Price-O'Brien); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 17:14:08 -0400; After reading several earlier "posts" to the Ten-Tec reflector about the subject of this e-mail, I risked eternal damnation by posting something that didn't include a discussion of Ten-Tec equipment,; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00277.html (11,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]