Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+About\s+Ten\s+Tech\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+About\s+Ten\s+Tech\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] About Ten Tech (score: 1): Author: Howellh <haney.howell@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:35:12 -0400; I've checked my bookmarks a couple of times to make sure this isn't the Elecraft List. Fine radios, but I come here for Ten Tec discussions, not detailed histories of competing brands. Mike and I hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00342.html (6,823 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] About Ten Tech (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:04:41 +0200; If you have been here long Haney, then you must have become accustomed to the fact that we don't just discuss pure Ten-Tec topics. All sorts of topics relate to Ten-Tec. I've been in the group for 15; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00343.html (7,905 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] About Ten Tech (score: 1): Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 18:39:36 -0500; I have also been wondering a bit about the many posts seemingly centered on the products of Ten Tec's competitors. Not that I have anything against Icoms, as I have a nice IC-202 QRP 2 meter rig, or; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00345.html (11,277 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]