Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Administrivia\:\s+Replies\s+to\s+List\s+or\s+to\s+Sender\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Administrivia\:\s+Replies\s+to\s+List\s+or\s+to\s+Sender\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@directvinternet.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:17:37 -0800; One of the members of this list brought a potential problem to my attention today. As I have the list configured, the default reply is to the sender and not to the list. So, if someone hits the "repl; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00415.html (8,147 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:59:59 -0600; Jim, Dick Flanagan's Icom list has since Day One always replied to the list by default. One must do a little extra in order to send a private response. This has been argued repeatedly over the years; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00416.html (10,115 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:02:16 -0600; Jim, its correct as it is. The other option is real pain to respond to the sender alone. Requires copying and pasting and windoze often takes an extra bunch of control characters at the beginning of; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00417.html (7,940 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: dlabat@tcinternet.net (David LaBat); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:22:14 -0600; Like it the way it is Jim, can always hit reply all and delete who I don't want it to go to. Thanks for all the work, nice that you consider such things! 73, Dave KØXH -- Original Message -- F; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00418.html (9,208 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:43:32 -0500; Based on what we just went through setting up DX CHAT over on the NJDXA site (which by default was reply-to-list at first), I vote to leave things here be. 73, ron wn3vaw Go Steelers! One of the memb; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00419.html (8,816 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: n4ey@arrl.net (Steve); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:06:55 -0500; Don't change it. I like it as it is. Steve, N4EY; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00421.html (7,747 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: k4aal@jackatak.theporch.com (Ariel M. Elam); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:40:13 -0600; Hi Jim -- I like it just like it is. PLEASE do not change it. "Reply" & "Reply All" are side by side, so it is easy to choose. 73, Ariel, k4aal; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00423.html (8,921 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Administrivia: Replies to List or to Sender? (score: 1): Author: crobson@robsonco.com (Chris Robson); Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 07:02:52 -0500; The way I see it, this gives a person ample opportunity to think before inserting foot in mouth... I think we can leave it as is with very little pain. Thanks for giving us an opportunity to discuss; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00425.html (7,680 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]