Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ads\s+\+\s+New\s+Equipment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ads\s+\+\s+New\s+Equipment\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: AB4KX@aol.com (AB4KX@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 08:46:06 EST; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_918222367_boundary Content-ID: <0_918222367@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --part0_918222367_boundary Content; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00026.html (8,755 bytes)
2. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:10:58 -0500 (EST); The trouble with IC-706's, TS-50's et-al is THEY AREN'T SIMPLE. For that matter, the Scout isn't very simple either. Microprocessors and SMT components have made it almost impossible for the average; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00029.html (8,120 bytes)
3. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: ARDUJENSKI@aol.com (ARDUJENSKI@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 11:14:11 EST; A good rig might be the QRP PLUS design with a 50 watt amp that can switch in and out. It would lend itself to the TEN TEC type rigs and is a series of boards fairly easy to access...Alan KB7MBI -- F; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00032.html (7,588 bytes)
4. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: k5rov@wcc.net (James Parsons); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 10:44:17 +0000; With the decline of CW on the ham bands, and more in sight, would it really pay Ten Tec to build a modern CW only transceiver these days? Yes, there is a decline. I have been on CW since 1939. I can; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00033.html (11,691 bytes)
5. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: k5rov@wcc.net (James Parsons); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 14:12:33 +0000; No, No NO, I will never believe there is more CW activity today than in the 1950's. In 1950 the 40 meter band was loaded during the day, and most hams of that era were on CW. Do you really believe th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00037.html (14,841 bytes)
6. Fwd: [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 14:56:49 -0500; Jim: Possibly it's your QTH....but here in the Northeast there is no lack of CW activity during the day...from 40 meters on up. Having surveyed the CW scene since 1954, I notice MORE CW activity duri; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00039.html (13,731 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 16:12:29 -0500; Jim: I did not say most hams were on CW today. I did say that mid-day CW activity is greater today than decades ago. I remember those earlier years as being very quiet during the day, especially 40M.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00044.html (9,170 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Ads + New Equipment (score: 1): Author: carl.s.hyde@lmco.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 09:16:10 -0500; Thats because decades ago all those hams were working for a living like you and I do. Now the Old Boys are retired and can sit at home and enjoy daytime operating on CW. And they do enjoy it. I was o; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00056.html (12,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]