Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Annotation\s+to\s+prices\s+in\s+perspective\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Annotation\s+to\s+prices\s+in\s+perspective\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:49:08 EDT; I failed to completely annotate my previous posting. Quoted retail prices were from the Hattiesburg American (Hattiesburg, Ms) edition of 5/6/69. Average salaries are quoted from the financial "secti; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00500.html (8,317 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:05:59 -0700; Pete; You forgot about the price of gasoline, which as I recall was about 25 - 30 cents a gallon on average and occasionally there was this phenomenon called a "gas war" where the price could drop in; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00501.html (9,304 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:15:00 -0700 (PDT); Comparing historic radio prices against general consumer goods prices does indeed provide an interesting perspective of what today's radios really cost relative our other daily purchases. And no doub; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00504.html (8,379 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:07:18 -0500; If the average american household had 2.3 ham radio transceivers, and production runs were typically in the hundreds of thousands or millions, I would likely concur with the comparision to consumer e; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00505.html (10,135 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:40:42 -0700 (PDT); My underlying point is that ham radio gear of today is more or less on par with other consumer electronics. They ultimately share much in common technology-wise. Comparing ham gear to other items, es; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00506.html (9,697 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 15:10:25 -0400; There's been discussion of comparing top of the line rig prices in real dollars now vs. then, but relatively little discussion of some of the performance issues vs. price for older vs. newer. What w; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00507.html (9,713 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:06:51 -0400; Scott: Yep. And you even get that "digital" sounding carrier at no extra charge. (per QST review). Then throw in the 930's auto-tuner and built in power supply to help even things up a bit. True. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00510.html (11,087 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]