- 1. [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Clark <w8do@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
- Having purchased an Orion, close a year ago, I'd like to comment that it still exceeds expectatons. No clicks, no BCI, no problems with my Titan amplifier and no shut downs while call DX or engaged i
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00014.html (8,094 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:47:43 -0500
- Dave, I'm in agreement with you. Let me first say that I have nowhere near the technical knowledge of many of you on the reflector. I do, however have a good understanding of how our radios work and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00018.html (8,266 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:51:20 -0400
- One thing I've noticed. Those that use the N4pY software to drive their Orions have a lot less complaints. What does this tell us? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00019.html (8,831 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:05:35 -0400
- It tells us nothing until you do a careful comparison of operating behavior in native mode vs. N4PY mode and uncover the differences for anyone to repeat. Ja? 73, Barry N1EU _________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00020.html (8,046 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:35:28 -0400
- It tells me that maybe Ten Tec should reverse the path they followed with the Pegasus and Jupiter and make an "Orion NFP" (no front panel) model. Enhance the remote control interface a little bit and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00021.html (10,917 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:44:41 +0000
- That would be nice, but the Pegasus didn't fly because the average Ham has to have his front panel,knobes and buttons. They didn't sell like they hoped. I dought that much has changed. I know I would
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00022.html (12,223 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
- One thing I've noticed. Those that use the N4pY software to drive their Orions have a lot less complaints. What does this tell us? That N4PY should be programming the firmware in the radio itself? I
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00024.html (8,276 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:42:37 -0400
- I have infinite respect for Carl, N4PY, but let's recognize that writing real-time embedded software is not the same as writing a back-end that only needs to communicate on the serial port. One of th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00029.html (9,953 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:32:33 -0000
- REminds me of UNIX... _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00034.html (11,438 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:23:02 -0400
- n4lq wirtes: "One thing I've noticed. Those that use the N4pY software to drive their Orions have a lot less complaints. What does this tell us?" Duh, lets see, I know! I know! They're too busy on th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00087.html (8,368 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu