Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Another\s+2\.033\s+problem\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 21:04:12 -0700
I just noticed, and verified another problem with the 2.033 firmware. Both the manual Notch and Auto Notch now cause noticeable artifacts when they have nulled a carrier. The artifacts were not prese
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00154.html (7,092 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 00:25:30 -0700
The artifacts appear to come from and be related to the remaining audio, so you probably wouldn't hear anything with just a carrier and random noise. I used the big 40 meter SW broadcast signals to t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00159.html (7,156 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:40:16 -0600
Ron, I did not stay with 2.033 went back to 2.032. Your posts are genuine and helpful, I don't think you need to fear. <grin> Seeing that you might be paraphrasing one of my posts, I should think tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00198.html (8,946 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:23:51 -0700
I have also gone back to 2.032. I notified TT about the new notch problem last night. Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00204.html (10,166 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: Lin Davis <linbdavis@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 21:42:29 -0400
Hi Ron, Just curious if you have hardware NB on when you experience the artifacts. I haven't put v2.033 on yet. I just had a listen to a 40 meters, about 1 khz above a strong BC, with AN set to 9 and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00209.html (8,455 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 20:32:40 -0700
I did the test with just the notch, both manual and automatic. The artifacts were continuous and related to the modulation in the passband, although when there was no modulation, there were no artifa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00216.html (10,220 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 23:07:45 -0500
Except it's missing one. NR -- restore the v1 algorithms, and move it back inside the AGC loop. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com h
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00218.html (8,143 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:11:33 EDT
Yes, Please.....NR -- restore the v1 algorithms, and move it back inside the AGC loop. Please, Please TT. Lee, KC9CDT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00271.html (7,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu